60 Comments
Nov 4, 2023Liked by Dr Philip McMillan

Until proven otherwise, it is every right of an unvaccinated to request transfusion from another unvaccinated.

Anything else would be unethical and unscientific.

Expand full comment
author

In principle, but not easy to execute.

Expand full comment

Yes, as long as administrators everywhere don’t recognise the mounting research findings that the presence of m-RNA remains in the blood is a big problem. In Britain, as seen in a comment ahead, they have set infection and LC related limits on donors, but they too avoid talking about vaccinated donors. It is still possible to secure safe blood from a donor if his infection/vaccination history is ascertained first.

Expand full comment

Not easy but can be done!

Expand full comment
Feb 6·edited Feb 6

It would be lacking of sound medical advise. Transfection is ome of the most ridiculous things to come out of medicine, or evil. Altering the dna in any way is catastrophic, esp in fighting disease. Besides it not preventing the spread, it's well known that it is extremely dangerous, lethal atthis point. No one should take these shots but in particular someone in dire medical crisis. I had a friend diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer in 2019. Any Dr. Knows this is a death sentence, and generally only live for months. They were willing to take anything, and get in any trial to fight for life. Then convid struck, they started with the first two, then tumors developed in the lungs. Then a booster, then a heart issue. Then they died. Under 50 years of age.They fought for four years. I truly believe they would have gone into remission had the shots not been taken. You don't live for four years with pancreatic cancer, generally. Even if one is to believe vaccination prevents the spread of disease, there is no sound medical argument for pumping aluminum, mercury, tromethanine, peg's into a health compromised individual, and especially not babies. Difficult to pull off when the medical complex doesn't acknowledge the complete and utter failure of the whole thing. I will pray for Ms Anna, we all should. God bless her.

Expand full comment
Nov 4, 2023Liked by Dr Philip McMillan

I'm just really surprised that out of all those super intelligent MD's, PhD's and the like who have educated millions of us, unvaccinated, to the dangers of that junk/poison in the jabs that none, not a single one of them has tested, although complex, the blood of the vaccinated.

The UNvaccinated needs to know through testing and other measures that when or if, God forbid, we need a transfusion, that that blood IS safe regardless of who we get it from.

This absolutely terrifies me to think I might have to use the blood of a vaccinated person.

Expand full comment
author

Whilst I understand the thought, if a blood transfusion is urgently needed, the worry about the potential risk should be lower on your priority, unless getting regular transfusions (eg Haemophilia).

Expand full comment

Do you feel the psychosomatic aspect of the patient, knowing how dangerous the blood is, could affect the success of the transfusion? And secondly, "if" the mrna spike exists in within the blood given in transfusion, knowing it negatively impacts blood cells, etc., along with impeding immune function as well, wouldn't the end result be the same? God bless❤️

I would like to see if a large group of people can gather in prayer dor Ms Anna, at the same time, wherever we are.

Matthew 18 20

When 2 or 3 are gathered in my name I am in their midst."

Expand full comment

My thought into this is if 1 covid-19 vaxx can lead to death or other horrible side effects, why couldn't 1 transfusion of vaxx blood lead to the same issues and possibly death.

We just don't know for sure, for the UNvaccinated, if the 1 time getting a transfusion from vaxxed blood will be the one that harms us.

We just don't know for sure. And that is the greatest concern.

Are there studies on unvaxxed ppl who got a blood transfusion from vaxxed blood?

If so, what are the results??

I wish we knew. I'd love to know so if or when I had to get one, I would be making an informed decision as to get it or not.

WE JUST DON'T KNOW.

Expand full comment

Back in the late '60's, my father had 3/4ths of his stomach removed from bleeding ulcers in an emergency surgery, and was given quite a few pints of blood during the 7 hour procedure...years later, after he recovered fully, and was incentivized to give blood donations, they discovered that he tested positive for hepC, and realized that when he had received those pints of blood during the operation years prior, they didn't test for that, but knew that the primary resource for the blood back then were street people, homeless, or drug addicts...it's such a racket, and I saw a video of how the red cross blood donations make tons of money selling the contaminated blood and plasma...unbelievable!

Expand full comment

I, just recently, saw some of that same information. The Red Cross selsl it to labs and to othe countries.

I was a big-time blood donor. Not anymore.

It's sickening how TRC is farming out donated blood!!!!

For profit no less!!!

Expand full comment

sells**

Expand full comment

Right, there needs to be more study into this.

Expand full comment
Nov 4, 2023Liked by Dr Philip McMillan

Have her unvaxxed friends and family donate specifically for her.

Expand full comment
author

Still challenging to get those units for the person.

Will need unvaccinated blood banks across the country.

Expand full comment

ARC has partnered with the globalists ideology, as far as I can tell from reading articles about the unvaxxed blood supply system. I did join Safe Blood, a worldwide organized, grassroots alternative.

https://mailchi.mp/safeblood.ch/november-newsletter-6274089?e=6897d8e421

Expand full comment

If that's what it takes!

Expand full comment

I tested with my husband and daughter and I am the only one that can receive blood from the other.

Expand full comment
Nov 5, 2023Liked by Dr Philip McMillan

I did not get the experimental "vaccine" for a good reason. With all the hype, fear mongering and threats we received in attempts to force acceptance of this experimental junk, I reasoned that the jab, like the disease, was designed to de-populate the earth. I am not ready to be de-populated! "Scientist" told lie after lie to sell the jab. I do not want the spike protein in my body if I can avoid it. Hopefully blood banks will be created for the UN-jabbed.

Expand full comment
Nov 5, 2023·edited Nov 5, 2023Liked by Dr Philip McMillan

You cannot avoid the spike protein in your body if you get infected or if you breathe or ingest spikes shedding from an injected person nearby. The trick is to build up your immune system to catch them early at the mucosal layer and maybe eat some of the things that reduce spikes. Also, avoid breast milk from injected mothers (if you are a baby) and avoid eating products made from livestock that was injected or fed an mRNA product.

See also Dr. Pierre Kory's recent series on evidence of shedding https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/shedding-part-5-evidence-of-shedding

Expand full comment
Nov 5, 2023Liked by Dr Philip McMillan

A newly infected person can shed the whole virus via exhaling, for someone nearby to catch it by inhaling. But m-RNA vaccines produce only spike segments coded by it in the cells ? Can body shed them ( via exhalation ?) to get airborne and get caught by somebody ? If it is so, there is free transmission of these synthetic spike segments in the highly m-RNA vaccinated population in the West. Repeat vaccinations have slowed down considerably in 2023, so if this trend continues, the population can be expected to be free from free travel and residency of these spike protein segments by end 2024. Blood can be safe from then on. This mechanism of air borne vaccine spike segments is similar to what I was proposing two years ago ( Dr. McMillan is aware of this). That the free floating virus is a simple lipid shell containing only two RNA codes. This particle can move very freely outside, can be inhaled and exhaled too easily, explaining the rapid spread of the infection. Once inside, the two codes work. The first code creates all the external features of the virus particles, helping them to get anchored on the exterior of cell walls and move inside the cells. The second code opens now triggering replication. Someone who has inhaled more quantity than exhaling, can get to develop more viral load and thus become more infectious and sick,,, etc. etc. Outside thus, the structure of the virus particles are very similar to the m-RNA vaccine particles. Omicron has poor anchorage on cell walls and thus gets inhaled and exhaled very easily in this primitive form, explaining its facile spread and vaccine escape. Dr. Krishna Bera, your valuable views on this, please.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you Moro.

My many difference in thinking is that lipid nanoparticles would not get assembled again once inside a cell.

The bigger concern is the potential risk of exosomes, which cells normally use to circulate mRNA and proteins throughout the body.

If mRNA is being circulated in that way, especially from a long lived immune cell, the risks are long term and unknown.

Expand full comment

My conceptualisation of the primitive form of the virus is gross, given my ignorance of biology. I am not visualising any assembly of lipid nano particles inside the cell. In my view, the primitive particles hangaround the outer walls of the cell once inhaled. Some grow, via its one RNA, all the external features on the lipid shell including the spike proteins. The others get exhaled out without any change. When they are there, they can evoke an allergic response from the body causing the initial symptoms. Those that have grown the external features can now enter the cell, use the second RNA and begin a full scale replication. Depending on how much has entered the cell with its full external features, the infection can be asymptomatic, mild or severe. The m-RNA vaccine is also lipid encased particle. But its RNA is coded to produce only an active segment of the spike protein, which is not exactly identical to the virus spike. Is this picture correct. I cannot comprehend the exact featured structure of this spike protein segment generated by the vaccine inside the cell. I don’t know if it is bare or encased in a lipid shell. I presume it has to be bare, to enable our immune system to spot of them exactly and produce matching anti bodies. In the process, it can move around the entire body via the blood stream. But as you said, m- RNA itself gets circulated throughout the body and thus its off-shoot, the spike protein segment gets produced everywhere in the body. But I cannot visualise how the spike segments, the breakdown product of the vaccine, gets exhaled for others outside to catch it. My in tact primitive virus particle is different. It is inhaled in and some or much of it is exhaled out. I would like Dr. Krishna Bera to explain how the spike from the injection is moved out of the body for others to catch it. If that happens for real, it is another epidemic or pandemic from a totally synthetic ( even if produced in the body) protein. There is no justification then for it being SARS Cov-2 virus and the illness Covid-19.

Expand full comment
Nov 5, 2023·edited Nov 5, 2023

1) i am not a doctor or phd

2) in the case of lactating mothers, lipids do form around spike mRNA and the baby will consume them. DrBeen has explained a JAMA paper about this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuiL9FBW8fI

3) Dr.Kory notes at the cited link, "LNP’s or spike could be transmitted via breath, saliva, sputum, or sweat". presumably exosomes. i think he and others are still investigating how this can be as viable and potent a means of transmission as the anecdotal evidence seems to say.

Expand full comment

Many thanks for the clarifications. It is quite clear now about the role, movements and activities of the m-RNA spike. More than the vaccine, it is this spike now that resembles the primitive structure of the virus that I had long postulated. It is even more clear that with its facile transmission in the population, this is a parallel epidemic in highly vaccinated countries. Not officially accepted yes. If you and others conversing here are also taking part in other conversations ( Dr. Been, for example) or contacts with research groups etc, I request you to share this view of the primitive form of the original virus with them. I would very much like this conceptualisation examined critically by researchers. I am depending on Dr. McMillan’s podcasts for this purpose. Thanks, once again.

Expand full comment

Wait a minute! There are two systems of immunity. "Inhaling" invokes the mucosal system first. It is NOT in the blood. In most non vaxxed or originalvaxxed people, they have had natural immunity. It isn't likely the blood will be involved at the level being discussed for blood donations. Your assumption of the modSpikes ,the psi-mRNA, the LNP, and the DNA contaminants not being in blood samples by the end of 2024 has no scientific basis. The rest of your comment doesn't seem relevant. Please explain.

Expand full comment
Nov 4, 2023Liked by Dr Philip McMillan

I doubt that we can get unvaxxed blood even if we ask. Even if we have donors lined up. It is indeed worrisome! I do not understand how those tiny spike proteins would be filtered out. Red blood cells from vaxxed folks are irregular and clumped.

Expand full comment
author

The logistics of doing it is difficult, even if blood banks were trying.

Currently they would probably refuse to accommodate the request.

Expand full comment
Nov 5, 2023Liked by Dr Philip McMillan

https://safeblood.com/

Sorry for the repetition. I’m having trouble with data.

Expand full comment
Nov 9, 2023Liked by Dr Philip McMillan

My haemaglobin level got down to 64-65 about six weeks ago. It is the third time in three years and doctors were perplexed as to why. As much as I hated the thought of getting vaccinated blood, I had absolutely no choice if I wanted to stay alive each time! Four units and two of iron followed this last time round. An endoscopy was performed and a large hiatal hernia was found and finally a diagnosis that now seems confirmed has me in the best condition in years. Cameron lesions, meaning the small blood vessels in my upper stomach were constantly breaking open from rubbing against my diaphragm. Weeks later my haemaglobin is now a constant 120-130 and red blood cell count a constant 45-50. The cure was ridiculously simple....pantoprazole!! Now all I worry about is what that blood might have done to me, as before the transfusions, for the VERY FIRST TIME ever, I was required to sign a release form to be allowed to have it. I'm in Australia.

Expand full comment
author

No need to worry as the benefit of transfusion outweighed any potential risks.

In truth it should be small.

Expand full comment

What was the role of pantoprazole as treatment …… yours was a case of losing blood constantly from the stomach lesions. Great, you recovered with some timely diagnosis and measures. Best wishes.

Expand full comment

Awaiting your clarification on the role of pantoprazole as treatment. Thanks

Expand full comment
Nov 5, 2023·edited Nov 5, 2023Liked by Dr Philip McMillan

Could they slip a stream of nattokinase or other spike eliminating fluid into the donated blood?

Also, arent there other remedies to anemia or that get the marrow rejuvenated and producing again?

Currently the hospital system and medical guilds (colleges of physicians and surgeons) need to be purged of big pharma influence and mRNA injection harm-deniers and more broadly anyone with fascist ethics who doesnt believe in informed consent of the patient.

Expand full comment
Nov 5, 2023Liked by Dr Philip McMillan

The ‘SafeBlood’ organisation has been addressing this since 2021, after finding much damage to red blood cells in the vaccinated.

However I remember recalling that even the unvaccinated could be similarly affected.

Live blood analysis of the transfusion filtrate needs to be done?

Expand full comment

Everybody, including unvaccinated, has caught and fought off the virus at this point. There is not a drop to be had at the blood bank that does not include a trace of its RNA.

This fact should be taken into account in this equation.

Expand full comment
Nov 5, 2023·edited Nov 5, 2023

The synthetic material in the injections lasts much longer (at least 4 months) and has much greater distribution inside the body than with naturally acquired infection of the virus variants (long Covid cases approach similar penetration but the pattern is different). There is the possibility that the mRNA which makes your cells a spike factory integrates into your own DNA and then passes to your future offspring. Recent injectees also have to worry about contamination of their batch with bacterial DNA plasmids and SV40 promoter fragments, neither of which would be in the naturally acquired infections.

Expand full comment

I agree. The vaccine acts a lot like a man made virus all by it’s self. It appears to be much worse to humans than the virus it was to prevent. It NEVER prevented a single person from the virus but the vaccine managed to infect billions of people.

My unvaccinated blood contains persistent antibodies to the omicron variant of COVID-19. It does not contain any of the covid-vax virus.

Expand full comment

Well said. What is the reason for the synthetic spike from the vaccine lasting longer in the body, being wide spread in the body ( one explanation given by Dr. McMillan elsewhere in this comments box) and being worse - all compared to the natural virus ? The m-RNA vaccine acts very much like a man made virus. That is why I said in another comment that the vaccine effect is another epidemic, different from and running parallel with the natural omicron epidemic.

Expand full comment
Nov 5, 2023·edited Nov 5, 2023

The synthetic spike was built that way so that it does not induce an immune reaction and therefore last longer to produce more spikes and reduces the amount needed for a "vaccine" (actually a genetic therapy) - thats essentially what the inventors got their Nobel prize for. It is still tbd how long the synthetic spikes containing N1-methyl-pseudouridine take to degrade in the body. See https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/pseudouridine-what-is-it-and-why

As for why they spread everywhere, that is due to the use of the lipid nanoparticle containers which are carried to cells of the body that naturally (as part of normal processes) demand lipids for their nutrition and function. The cells would be in organs such as liver, heart, gonads, brain, etc (see rat study submitted to Japanese FDA). This was a good design in general for widespread drug delivery, but should not have been used for these mRNA injections due to the spike's toxicity.

Why they dont stay near the injection site is another question. Some say non-aspiration of needle leading to blood vessel delivery, some say spikes travel through cell walls easily and reproduce on the way. However the spikes were supposed to eventually travel to the lymph nodes where antibodies were supposed to be made.

Expand full comment

Very enlightening details. What is the idea of designing the spike not to elicit immune response and staying longer in the body ? It explains though why the vaccines were not stopping infection spread. A huge biological burden has been created in the population in the West. Luckily it could be got rid of in one or two years, left to itself.

Expand full comment
Nov 6, 2023·edited Nov 6, 2023

I am not clear on that question either, which becomes evident from my contradiction above that you have noticed. The spike is supposed to induce an immune response so that antibodies are made to the virus which has lots of spikes on its surface.

I think pseudo-uridine is supposed to cause less inflammation than regular uridine. We would have to lookup the research papers to see exactly why this is.

Expand full comment

I believe it was because they were designed to wreak complete havoc on the body by turning the body into a spike factory, invading every cell, organ and breaking blood brain barrier, inhibiting t cell to fight first, etc. And then there's the really poisonous additives!

Expand full comment

https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/24/15480

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Induces Hemagglutination: Implications for COVID-19 Morbidities and Therapeutics and for Vaccine Adverse Effects. Experimental findings for SARS-CoV-2 related to the glycan biochemistry of coronaviruses indicate that attachments from spike protein to glycoconjugates on the surfaces of red blood cells (RBCs), other blood cells and endothelial cells are key to the infectivity and morbidity of COVID-19. IVM blocked HA when added to RBCs prior to spike protein and reversed HA when added afterward. These results validate and extend prior findings on the role of glycan bindings of viral spike protein in COVID-19. They furthermore suggest therapeutic options using competitive glycan-binding agents such as IVM and may help elucidate rare serious adverse effects (AEs) associated with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, which use spike protein as the generated antigen.

Expand full comment

Officialdom everywhere does not recognise that this vaccine has post problems. All after effects are lumped as LC ( on the infection), while in reality most complications in these two years are LV. Technically I feel that blood from those whose last vaccination was at least one year old, who have not had any covid infection in one year and who had no LC issues in one year could be safe. One can find substantial population who will meet this criteria. Blood banks, especially private sector ones, can ensure these criteria and collect blood. In public interest, govt run blood banks also can follow these, without any hit to their collection volumes. For extra safety, one more criterion could be added - donors who had older infections were also treated early and did not go into the auto immune phase - but it might limit the number of donors. Interested, resourced samaritans could start such blood banks.

Expand full comment

https://www.blood.co.uk/news-and-campaigns/news-and-statements/coronavirus-covid-19-updates/

Answer to the question "Can a patient choose to receive blood from a donor who has received, or has not received, a COVID-19 vaccine?":

"No. Hospital clinicians match blood to a patient based on blood type. Blood donation is confidential and anonymous and no personal information about the donor is shared with the patient, and vice versa."

Also this regarding the rights and non-rights of Jehovah's Witnesses:

https://adc.bmj.com/content/90/7/715

Expand full comment

Recall the huge scandal with HIV contaminated blood infecting recipients before they bothered to check for that.

Expand full comment

They didn't bother on purpose. During the 80's it is known that Birx wanted clean blood while being hospitalized. They knew it was going to be in the blood. All virus' have a US patent, including hiv/aids.

Expand full comment