This is something to share with your pro-vax friends – why it’s ok to change your mind about Covid vaccines. As science and available information evolve, so too can views and decisions. Absolute statements about safety and efficacy of vaccines early in the vaccination program were unreasonable given the time it takes to assess these characteristics thoroughly, but assurances were what so many wanted or needed to hear at that time - that’s understandable.
I think actor Tim Robbins is a more sincere & humble example of mind-change. This Adams guy attributes informed decisions to decline the jab w/ “luck”.
Even as the evidence of adverse events and lack of efficacy grows it is my observation this is not enough for most people to speak up even if not speaking up may result in their loved one having an adverse event. When we understand this behavior, we may be able to do something about it.
I understand you. You are writing for our loved ones, still injecting. you are gently nudging them to where they won't poison themselves or their children with a statistical cumulative time bomb. You understand how firm and political the belief of 'safety' or 'efficacy'. I understand that completely. There are many at risk. Thank-you for the difficult roll you are taking as a Dr.
it's not about being right or wrong. Scott Adams took to Twitter declaring 'we won' as if this was a contest. We 'won' what exactly? No one is spiking (is that a pun?) the ball. More importantly, no one wants to spike the ball. This is part of the story the 'other side' doesn't get. Saying so shows projection on their part.
Adams wants an 'explanation' as to how 'we' got it 'right'. This reeks of Emily Oster's contemptuous and tone-deaf 'Yeh, you were vindicated but were lucky. We were really right but unlucky because the virus didn't act the way we thought but we continued with the idiotic narrative anyway destroying lives to protect our pride and reputations. Can we get amnesty? Pretty please?"
The task of explaining this is too nuanced and enormously complex to convey in 140 characters. Intuition, personal experience, knowledge of history (where tyranny and coercive ideologies are concerned or the fact the pharmaceutical industry is a repeat felony offender), and skeptical and cynical character traits are just some of the reasons. Then there are those who immediately sensed something was off and researched. Despite not being 'credentialed' or in a white coat, they assessed and applied critical thinking to the issue. And maintained confidence in their skills under severe duress, provocation, censorship and chastisement. These are just some of the reasons 'why', Scott.
Thank you Dr. McM. If anyone out there still refuses to see the potential risks & possible harms from these injections. Then unless a miracle occurs. The pro injection people will keep on keeping on.
Billions of people around the world have been coerced and tricked into having medical interventions, i.e. the Covid jabs.
In my opinion, no-one has given informed consent.
I'll say that again... NO-ONE has given informed consent...because no-one was properly informed they were participating in a global experiment, being repeatedly injected against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn't a serious threat to most people.
When will the penny drop I wonder?
And who has played a major role in this catastrophe?
The health practitioners who inserted the needle... It was their responsibility to get informed consent, but how many did that?
This is the powder keg that is waiting to explode, particularly in those countries which mandated the jabs, e.g. countries such as Australia, where jab mandates were widespread, e.g. No Jab, No Job, and informed consent was trashed.
I think actor Tim Robbins is a more sincere & humble example of mind-change. This Adams guy attributes informed decisions to decline the jab w/ “luck”.
Thanks for sharing this important topic especially if there is another big Push Autumn Winter 2023
Even as the evidence of adverse events and lack of efficacy grows it is my observation this is not enough for most people to speak up even if not speaking up may result in their loved one having an adverse event. When we understand this behavior, we may be able to do something about it.
I understand you. You are writing for our loved ones, still injecting. you are gently nudging them to where they won't poison themselves or their children with a statistical cumulative time bomb. You understand how firm and political the belief of 'safety' or 'efficacy'. I understand that completely. There are many at risk. Thank-you for the difficult roll you are taking as a Dr.
Watched the video and just thought what a plank, reading the comments would support this view point👍
it's not about being right or wrong. Scott Adams took to Twitter declaring 'we won' as if this was a contest. We 'won' what exactly? No one is spiking (is that a pun?) the ball. More importantly, no one wants to spike the ball. This is part of the story the 'other side' doesn't get. Saying so shows projection on their part.
Adams wants an 'explanation' as to how 'we' got it 'right'. This reeks of Emily Oster's contemptuous and tone-deaf 'Yeh, you were vindicated but were lucky. We were really right but unlucky because the virus didn't act the way we thought but we continued with the idiotic narrative anyway destroying lives to protect our pride and reputations. Can we get amnesty? Pretty please?"
The task of explaining this is too nuanced and enormously complex to convey in 140 characters. Intuition, personal experience, knowledge of history (where tyranny and coercive ideologies are concerned or the fact the pharmaceutical industry is a repeat felony offender), and skeptical and cynical character traits are just some of the reasons. Then there are those who immediately sensed something was off and researched. Despite not being 'credentialed' or in a white coat, they assessed and applied critical thinking to the issue. And maintained confidence in their skills under severe duress, provocation, censorship and chastisement. These are just some of the reasons 'why', Scott.
In short, we saw and called the bull shit out.
Thank you Dr. McM. If anyone out there still refuses to see the potential risks & possible harms from these injections. Then unless a miracle occurs. The pro injection people will keep on keeping on.
To put things in perspective...
Billions of people around the world have been coerced and tricked into having medical interventions, i.e. the Covid jabs.
In my opinion, no-one has given informed consent.
I'll say that again... NO-ONE has given informed consent...because no-one was properly informed they were participating in a global experiment, being repeatedly injected against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn't a serious threat to most people.
When will the penny drop I wonder?
And who has played a major role in this catastrophe?
The health practitioners who inserted the needle... It was their responsibility to get informed consent, but how many did that?
This is the powder keg that is waiting to explode, particularly in those countries which mandated the jabs, e.g. countries such as Australia, where jab mandates were widespread, e.g. No Jab, No Job, and informed consent was trashed.
Interesting times ahead...