For those of you who’ve followed my work over the past few years, you know I rarely jump into speculative territory. But occasionally, something crosses my screen that forces me to pause — not because it’s sensational, but because it’s disturbingly plausible.
Today was one of those moments.
A well-known figure (Dr David Martin) — often dismissed as a conspiracy theorist — recently brought attention to a scenario buried in the 2024 National Blueprint for Biodefense. It describes a biological attack killing 280,000 Americans on a single day: July 4, 2025. The agent in question? A genetically modified Nipah virus.
Now before you roll your eyes, understand this: the document is real. The scenario is fictional — but its structure, timing, and implications bear an uncanny resemblance to Event 201, the pandemic simulation held just two months before COVID-19 surfaced. That tabletop exercise envisioned a zoonotic coronavirus causing global disruption. Mere coincidence? Maybe. But it got me thinking.
What Is Nipah?
Nipah is a high-mortality zoonotic virus, first identified in Malaysia in 1998. Originating from fruit bats, it can spread to pigs and humans, causing encephalitis, respiratory failure, and vascular collapse. Mortality rates range from 40–75%. Thankfully, its natural transmission is inefficient — person-to-person spread has historically been limited to close contact in small outbreaks.
Until now, that has kept it contained.
But the biodefense scenario describes a genetically modified Nipah virus that spreads efficiently from animal to human and person to person, while retaining its terrifying fatality rate. That’s not a conspiracy. That’s the government’s own war-game script.
The Furin Cleavage Site Connection
If you’ve studied SARS-CoV-2’s entry mechanism, you’ll be familiar with the furin cleavage site — a molecular feature not found in most human coronaviruses, but one that dramatically enhances infectivity and tissue tropism. Without it, COVID-19 might never have reached pandemic levels.
Here’s the disturbing thought: what if a furin cleavage site was added to Nipah?
That’s the kind of modification that could transform it from a village-killer to a city-crippler — enabling fast, aerosolized transmission and earlier infection of the lungs, brain, and endothelium. Based on published models, this is technically feasible and potentially devastating.
Why Autopsies Matter Now More Than Ever
This brings me to a frustration I’ve raised repeatedly: the near-total absence of systematic autopsies in vaccinated individuals who die from COVID-related complications. We've accumulated thousands of autopsies from early in the pandemic. But now, when we should be asking:
Is the mechanism of death the same post-vaccination or post-reinfection?
Could persistent spike protein be priming the immune system for failure?
...we get silence.
Why is that?
If another virus — say, a genetically modified Nipah — were released or emerged, how would we even distinguish it from COVID STORM (Spike Triggered autOimmune Response Mechanism) or a vaccine-triggered flare-up? Both can cause brain inflammation, vascular injury, respiratory failure. The overlap could mask one with the other.
That’s the perfect storm: an immune system weakened by one engineered agent, followed by the introduction of another with a different but complementary method of attack.
What I’m Really Saying
No, I’m not predicting a July 4th biological attack. I’m saying this:
The blueprint exists.
The virus exists.
The technology to modify it exists.
And the failure to investigate immune dysfunction in the current population leaves us blind to what’s coming next.
We cannot afford to dismiss this as theoretical. If we’ve learned anything from COVID, it’s that scenarios can become reality — fast.
And if you still think the furin cleavage site was a coincidence, just remember:
It was patented before the pandemic… by people who profited from the vaccines.
Coincidence? Perhaps. But biology doesn't do politics — it just follows the code it's given.
Final Thoughts
I don’t offer answers today. But I do offer questions worth asking. And I ask them not as a conspiracy theorist — but as a clinician, researcher, and someone who still believes science should seek truth, not permission.
If you agree that we need more autopsies, more data transparency, and more honesty in our pandemic response — share this article.
Let’s not sleepwalk into the next crisis.
Vejon COVID-19 Review is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Share this post