There is a difference between working in theory and working in reality.
I disagree that the mRNA technology "works" right now particularly if weighing risk-benefit. Here are just some of the reasons why:
You have no on/off switch in the human body with mRNA, do not risk the uncontrolled manufacturing of unnatural proteins in the body when synthesizing may not synthesize correctly, the spike protein alone could be dangerous and not the entire virus-like protein, particularly because the proteins can change shape as they move throughout the body. Additionally, LNPs also cross the blood brain barrier causing more risk. Question and be concerned with reverse transcriptase (gene "therapy") and self-amplifying RNA (saRNA).
The technology has yet to be proven, and experimental technology should not be forced or coerced or sold as "safe and effective" especially under a rushed/forced approval process.
I very much appreciate Dr Mulhotra’s outapokennness.
I wonder if at some point he will call for financial compensation for the millions harmed by the relentless diet-heart cholesterol-is-bad statins-are-good hypothesis. The promotion of a carb-based, vegetable-oil based lifestyle is very bad for humans (especially the veg oil part), and statins are known to be associated with new Type 2 diabetes, dementia, and increased cancer risk. Oh, and they do essentially nothing to reduce risk of heart disease.
Amazing interview. Although it was terrifying. I still hope that the guilty ones are going to pay the price. There could never been accepted to silence the discussion on this topic.
There is a difference between working in theory and working in reality.
I disagree that the mRNA technology "works" right now particularly if weighing risk-benefit. Here are just some of the reasons why:
You have no on/off switch in the human body with mRNA, do not risk the uncontrolled manufacturing of unnatural proteins in the body when synthesizing may not synthesize correctly, the spike protein alone could be dangerous and not the entire virus-like protein, particularly because the proteins can change shape as they move throughout the body. Additionally, LNPs also cross the blood brain barrier causing more risk. Question and be concerned with reverse transcriptase (gene "therapy") and self-amplifying RNA (saRNA).
The technology has yet to be proven, and experimental technology should not be forced or coerced or sold as "safe and effective" especially under a rushed/forced approval process.
Excellent point.
I very much appreciate Dr Mulhotra’s outapokennness.
I wonder if at some point he will call for financial compensation for the millions harmed by the relentless diet-heart cholesterol-is-bad statins-are-good hypothesis. The promotion of a carb-based, vegetable-oil based lifestyle is very bad for humans (especially the veg oil part), and statins are known to be associated with new Type 2 diabetes, dementia, and increased cancer risk. Oh, and they do essentially nothing to reduce risk of heart disease.
Amazing interview. Although it was terrifying. I still hope that the guilty ones are going to pay the price. There could never been accepted to silence the discussion on this topic.
Thank you Dr Mcm.
Red flags ignored from the very outset of these injections.
The biggest Red Flag is that the regulatory authorities world wide have failed in their task of protecting us from harm.
Most accurate statement:
Everyone is responsible, no one is accountable.
Thanks for Sharing Dr McMillan much appreciated 👍
Crossposting this one. Thank you.
Thank you for cross posting :)
Susan was wonderful!!! Thank you for sharing. So informative and the information well thought out and easy for lay people to understand.