Is Ignorance an Excuse in Vaccine Regulation?
Discussion with Susan Langlois - Retired Pharma Regulatory Professional
YouTube Timecodes:
0:00 Intro
02:24 Who is Susan Langois?
04:47 Why are people in Pharma not speaking out?
06:38 Dr Malhotra interview on Fox news
11:45 What is the history of vaccine regulation?
20:10 Why are we here with vaccine responsibility (Stakeholders)
22:07 Initial thoughts on the roll out - Personal vaccination status
25:20 What is the responsibility to the individual?
28:00 Was it appropriate to encourage vaccination?
32:22 Should the CEO of Pharma companies be criminally liable?
36:00 Reputation of the Pharma industry - Will it be tarnished?
38:45 How do we judge if covid vaccines were beneficial?
41:10 What is an appropriate antibody target?
44:20 Should all vaccines be questioned?
50:02 Are individuals in Pharma who were silent part of the problem?
Following the discussion on Twitter with Dr Aseem Malhotra:
BREAKING:
Pfizer should compensate the vaccine injured says Cardiologist. ‘The fines should be so large that pharmaceutical companies risk going bankrupt and senior executives should go to jail if they knew their medical intervention was going to cause harm’.
Twitter Link:
Joined by Susan F. Langlois (Retired Pharma Vaccine Regulatory Professional) having over 40 years experience across many companies. Previously worked in industry, interacting with the FDA and Health Canada to bring vaccines to the market.
There is a difference between working in theory and working in reality.
I disagree that the mRNA technology "works" right now particularly if weighing risk-benefit. Here are just some of the reasons why:
You have no on/off switch in the human body with mRNA, do not risk the uncontrolled manufacturing of unnatural proteins in the body when synthesizing may not synthesize correctly, the spike protein alone could be dangerous and not the entire virus-like protein, particularly because the proteins can change shape as they move throughout the body. Additionally, LNPs also cross the blood brain barrier causing more risk. Question and be concerned with reverse transcriptase (gene "therapy") and self-amplifying RNA (saRNA).
The technology has yet to be proven, and experimental technology should not be forced or coerced or sold as "safe and effective" especially under a rushed/forced approval process.
I very much appreciate Dr Mulhotra’s outapokennness.
I wonder if at some point he will call for financial compensation for the millions harmed by the relentless diet-heart cholesterol-is-bad statins-are-good hypothesis. The promotion of a carb-based, vegetable-oil based lifestyle is very bad for humans (especially the veg oil part), and statins are known to be associated with new Type 2 diabetes, dementia, and increased cancer risk. Oh, and they do essentially nothing to reduce risk of heart disease.