The Who publication is mostly a propaganda one, not a good piece of science. How did they estimated the potential covid deaths without (and against...!) observational data? Through computer models that contradicts real data, as we see in Africa and also in New Zealand, namely from the data leaked by Barry Young? A good piece of evidence or data can only be falsified by a higher quality one, not through computer models as seem to be the case.
How are "covid deaths" being estimated / computed when the means by which covid infection was so universally flawed. And that "they" so easily attributed "cause " to covid infections and death and then were so blind to the deaths by covid "vaccination" is one huge red flag that all is not as scientific as "they" claim.
If Dr. McMillan has seen the WHO report and if the authors of the report are accessible, he should ask them about the biological mechanisms of how exactly the vaccines work in the body to reduce serious illness and deaths. And experimental evidence that the mechanism operates in the body. The estimate is simple pre school arithmetic. It assumes all those among the vaccinated seniors who did not die were the ones saved by the vaccine. Very clever, indeed.
>> Why would they then risk vaccinating their people against COVID-19?
Because Big Pharma can't have a population refusing to play and pay. Waiting for the uncovering of the "sales guidance", like "no jab, no malaria vaccine".
IIRC, we also should remember the DEAD Presidents/PMs of:
Tanzania (61) in 3/2021,
Ivory Coast (56) in 3/2021,
Swaziland (52) in 12/2020,
Burundi (55) in 6/2020,
Haiti (63) in 7/2021.
Each was against any proposed vax (because of the crimes against Africans by pharma cos in years past). Any other questions about what happens when you don't play ball with the deep state? These countries represent ~110M people.
Thanks Philip. I think the most impact will not have questions like yours (and that of many others of our "fighters" for Science and Ethics but the excess death rates. In the US I recently heard (cannot verify) that life insurances reported at the end of the first vaccination year 2021 an excess death rate in the class 16 - 65 by 40 % ! In Germany (they hide the numbers but somehow a scienist had recently cleaned up numbers and published it in the German EPOCH TIMES (pay article) and 2021 & 2022 show similar tendencies. We can only hope (but certainly cannot as Christs !!) that more and more "suddenly died" cases emerge so that the public slowly pays attention to excess death and hopefully it will be not too late to start massive autopsies focused on the typical findings of Prof. Püschel, Lang, Burkhardt (RIP) - so that the mass of Autopsies can be executed with high focus and efficiency otherwise I feel the capacities will not be enough. To me it is for sure: mRNA did not save as many lifes as it killed ! Simply because of the physics: Only maybe a 5 - 7 % of infected people were in the high-risk class to suffer from cytokine storms and eventially were put on ventilators which for sure has killed many of the patients not CoV2 ! So given this number of 5 - 7 % of an X% infected population within a country - the high number of vacc. people which exceeds probably the number of the sum of really naturally infected people (not just contaminated and recorded with an overly stupid RT-PCR test as infected !) will lead eventually to a higher number of casualties - especially in the event of many severe side effects and a probably incredibly high number of "silent severe adverse effects" . . . . which cause the 10s or 100s of thousands of "suddenly" died. Of course if the US insurance reporsts 40% of excess deaths amongs the 16 - 64 year olds everybody thinks "That cannot be" - we would really feel and see that". Nope - because during 16 - 64 normally people do not die. The death rates are low(est). So if from that "low"(est) 40 % die more and that evenly distributed throughout the year - this might go pretty much unnoticed. And that is the problem. People would realize earlier that every 50th dog is dyeing for 1 year than when it happens with humans :-) - right ? And that is the key - as long as the public does not realize excess death rates or 100, 200, 300 % higher cancer rates - officially published - nothing will happen. Politicians, Pharmabosses . . . i.e. where the power lies (even with justices) fight for their lives in freedom. They will do anything to put all under the carpet. Everything !!
Life insurance companies are the ones who offer medical insurance also. Excess deaths mean excess payouts, hitting their net profits/earnings. Did not those companies look into the causes of those deaths and even go into measures that would prevent them ? In this case, it was simple change in treatment protocols, often with cheaper, more effective drugs, that would have benefitted their medical insurance business also. These companies have capable doctors on their payrolls who can dig into these possibilities. They could also lobby with FDA/CDC etc for change in directives. It all could have ended very well for the companies, for the people, for the nation. How did this not happen ?
Interesting question Moro. Scenarios: 1. They did not know the outcome ? 2. Net- Loss for shareholders through increased pay-outs & shareholder value is less than the gain they have in other fields (pharma...) 3. If Net-Loss is substantial they will run havoc and we will see in the aftermath a terrible uncovering and responsibles going to jail - if Trumps President I see a possbility in that. 4. They are part of the "crime" because they knew it for quite some time (trending) and did not start e.g. autopsies to find the (known to a good 7O%) root causes and take counter measures for the new policies (e.g. if boostered no pay out - mRNA reason for exclusion). WOW - they wouldn't be allowed to do so by supreme cour. Of course there are subscenarios of thr above. The US can only get out of this fschist Corona Pandemic with a strong leader, a crazy man with disruptive, shocking measures! This can never be solved in a democratic way. Same accounts for the wars and plans of the Pentagon. This Pandemic, clima narrative and warmongering is dead end with no point of return, except a brutal clean-up will do the job. Society slept in democracy and now wakes up in dictatorship thats were most west governmemts are heading to.
Vitamin D3 protects from severe covid19, and I will assume that
a) Africa has average higher vitamin D3 levels than US/Europe
b) Africa may not have monitored it as intensly since they had not such severe impact
c) Africa will have more healthy ppl. and average younger people that have less chronic illnesses than the west - because of their better lifestyle and diet. absolutly not comparable the countries.
c) at last, I am not sure about their statistical quality. when I see how even switzerland is counting numbers and it is not standardized world wide how to count the different levels of illness.
another hint to numbers: it was found, that the numbers reported in switzerland even in the first two years of the pandemic where off about by factory two. they still did not correct the numbers reported.
the reporting was getting even worse and less accurate after Mar 22 when pandemic was called over.
since this year, its up to docs if they wanna report or not, and I think most will not consider reporting.
so basically, switzerland has no numbers at all, but they are still reporting something, I assume they are more guessing, because there is almost no monitoring left at all (they really dismantled almost all monitoring)
Why should Africa or other similar countries go about telling the World ( read Western Countries) how they handled Covid very efficiently, with minimum fuss and maximum clinical jurisprudence ? In this Information Age, the West would be first to know that story from beginning to end. If they have not cared to use that experience for themselves out of superiority complex, even when the two sets of outcomes are broad daylight, it is as much their responsibility as it is their destiny. In fact their medical administrations have gone about souring on their own few doctors who would see merit in the African model and try to promote them. Do they not know from their medical education that any proven successful medical experience from any where in the world is actually a world good ? After all, these countries were not using woodo medicines, but classical drugs, all from Western research in the past, some award winning and humanity saving and still being used by them, often in conditions related to Covid.
Those vaccinated seniors who did not die had that luck, because many of them took early anti viral medications or took steroids like dexamethasone under prescription at the beginning of the immune phase or were taking regular anti inflammatories/ anti histamines/immuno modulators for their existing conditions that were all protective interventions in this enveloping illness or simply their body had the resilience. Are these factors accounted for in the estimate ? The vaccine created anti bodies can only neutralise the virus and are not therapeutics at any stage of the illness. So, they have to engage the virus. This can happen theoretically on two occasions. At the mucosal gate as the virus is still probing an entry where its load is minimal. It is supposed to grow only within the host cells. Or, having managed to enter it is rapidly growing inside. If the vaccine activity can not work at Gate 1 on low viral loads ( it doesn’t prevent infection in the first place, officially conceded), how can it work later, when the loads are much higher ? Unless that happens, progression into serious illness and even deaths can not be stopped, unless again one of the four situations I mentioned at the start comes into play. Without biological data, evidences and explanations, this number cannot be defended anywhere.
Philip, can you explain why there ist this difference in the clinical courses as shown in graph 2 and 3 - if interferon antibodies are on their way? If interferon antibodies exist - why might there be once a delayed answer in interferon, and secondly a diminished one?
"They" needed to eliminate the Control Group.
Hoped Africa would have stood their ground.
Why vaccinate after the population had faced Omicron?
The Who publication is mostly a propaganda one, not a good piece of science. How did they estimated the potential covid deaths without (and against...!) observational data? Through computer models that contradicts real data, as we see in Africa and also in New Zealand, namely from the data leaked by Barry Young? A good piece of evidence or data can only be falsified by a higher quality one, not through computer models as seem to be the case.
How are "covid deaths" being estimated / computed when the means by which covid infection was so universally flawed. And that "they" so easily attributed "cause " to covid infections and death and then were so blind to the deaths by covid "vaccination" is one huge red flag that all is not as scientific as "they" claim.
If Dr. McMillan has seen the WHO report and if the authors of the report are accessible, he should ask them about the biological mechanisms of how exactly the vaccines work in the body to reduce serious illness and deaths. And experimental evidence that the mechanism operates in the body. The estimate is simple pre school arithmetic. It assumes all those among the vaccinated seniors who did not die were the ones saved by the vaccine. Very clever, indeed.
Excellent point.
With a bad hypothesis, unsupportive data increases. It's the opposite for a good hypothesis.
AND .... that is that ! :) No other questions necessary :)
>> Why would they then risk vaccinating their people against COVID-19?
Because Big Pharma can't have a population refusing to play and pay. Waiting for the uncovering of the "sales guidance", like "no jab, no malaria vaccine".
The truth will come out eventually.
IIRC, we also should remember the DEAD Presidents/PMs of:
Tanzania (61) in 3/2021,
Ivory Coast (56) in 3/2021,
Swaziland (52) in 12/2020,
Burundi (55) in 6/2020,
Haiti (63) in 7/2021.
Each was against any proposed vax (because of the crimes against Africans by pharma cos in years past). Any other questions about what happens when you don't play ball with the deep state? These countries represent ~110M people.
Indeed, and as I remember they didn´t allow any PCR test, like to have some reference to this information.
.
For Doctors Of Medicine:
This Is Not A Crisis Of Identity;
This Is Not A Crisis Of Competence
( ... There Is Too Little To Matter) ;
This Is A Crisis Of Conscience.
.
Thanks Philip. I think the most impact will not have questions like yours (and that of many others of our "fighters" for Science and Ethics but the excess death rates. In the US I recently heard (cannot verify) that life insurances reported at the end of the first vaccination year 2021 an excess death rate in the class 16 - 65 by 40 % ! In Germany (they hide the numbers but somehow a scienist had recently cleaned up numbers and published it in the German EPOCH TIMES (pay article) and 2021 & 2022 show similar tendencies. We can only hope (but certainly cannot as Christs !!) that more and more "suddenly died" cases emerge so that the public slowly pays attention to excess death and hopefully it will be not too late to start massive autopsies focused on the typical findings of Prof. Püschel, Lang, Burkhardt (RIP) - so that the mass of Autopsies can be executed with high focus and efficiency otherwise I feel the capacities will not be enough. To me it is for sure: mRNA did not save as many lifes as it killed ! Simply because of the physics: Only maybe a 5 - 7 % of infected people were in the high-risk class to suffer from cytokine storms and eventially were put on ventilators which for sure has killed many of the patients not CoV2 ! So given this number of 5 - 7 % of an X% infected population within a country - the high number of vacc. people which exceeds probably the number of the sum of really naturally infected people (not just contaminated and recorded with an overly stupid RT-PCR test as infected !) will lead eventually to a higher number of casualties - especially in the event of many severe side effects and a probably incredibly high number of "silent severe adverse effects" . . . . which cause the 10s or 100s of thousands of "suddenly" died. Of course if the US insurance reporsts 40% of excess deaths amongs the 16 - 64 year olds everybody thinks "That cannot be" - we would really feel and see that". Nope - because during 16 - 64 normally people do not die. The death rates are low(est). So if from that "low"(est) 40 % die more and that evenly distributed throughout the year - this might go pretty much unnoticed. And that is the problem. People would realize earlier that every 50th dog is dyeing for 1 year than when it happens with humans :-) - right ? And that is the key - as long as the public does not realize excess death rates or 100, 200, 300 % higher cancer rates - officially published - nothing will happen. Politicians, Pharmabosses . . . i.e. where the power lies (even with justices) fight for their lives in freedom. They will do anything to put all under the carpet. Everything !!
Life insurance companies are the ones who offer medical insurance also. Excess deaths mean excess payouts, hitting their net profits/earnings. Did not those companies look into the causes of those deaths and even go into measures that would prevent them ? In this case, it was simple change in treatment protocols, often with cheaper, more effective drugs, that would have benefitted their medical insurance business also. These companies have capable doctors on their payrolls who can dig into these possibilities. They could also lobby with FDA/CDC etc for change in directives. It all could have ended very well for the companies, for the people, for the nation. How did this not happen ?
Interesting question Moro. Scenarios: 1. They did not know the outcome ? 2. Net- Loss for shareholders through increased pay-outs & shareholder value is less than the gain they have in other fields (pharma...) 3. If Net-Loss is substantial they will run havoc and we will see in the aftermath a terrible uncovering and responsibles going to jail - if Trumps President I see a possbility in that. 4. They are part of the "crime" because they knew it for quite some time (trending) and did not start e.g. autopsies to find the (known to a good 7O%) root causes and take counter measures for the new policies (e.g. if boostered no pay out - mRNA reason for exclusion). WOW - they wouldn't be allowed to do so by supreme cour. Of course there are subscenarios of thr above. The US can only get out of this fschist Corona Pandemic with a strong leader, a crazy man with disruptive, shocking measures! This can never be solved in a democratic way. Same accounts for the wars and plans of the Pentagon. This Pandemic, clima narrative and warmongering is dead end with no point of return, except a brutal clean-up will do the job. Society slept in democracy and now wakes up in dictatorship thats were most west governmemts are heading to.
Vitamin D3 protects from severe covid19, and I will assume that
a) Africa has average higher vitamin D3 levels than US/Europe
b) Africa may not have monitored it as intensly since they had not such severe impact
c) Africa will have more healthy ppl. and average younger people that have less chronic illnesses than the west - because of their better lifestyle and diet. absolutly not comparable the countries.
c) at last, I am not sure about their statistical quality. when I see how even switzerland is counting numbers and it is not standardized world wide how to count the different levels of illness.
just my opinion, like your headlines.
another hint to numbers: it was found, that the numbers reported in switzerland even in the first two years of the pandemic where off about by factory two. they still did not correct the numbers reported.
the reporting was getting even worse and less accurate after Mar 22 when pandemic was called over.
since this year, its up to docs if they wanna report or not, and I think most will not consider reporting.
so basically, switzerland has no numbers at all, but they are still reporting something, I assume they are more guessing, because there is almost no monitoring left at all (they really dismantled almost all monitoring)
Africa hardly being touched by COVID, can be explained easily by 3 things. Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, and UVB rays year round near the equator.
More info here at....
https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/ivermectin-stats-and-side-effects
https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/what-you-thought-you-knew-of-d3-hardly
Why should Africa or other similar countries go about telling the World ( read Western Countries) how they handled Covid very efficiently, with minimum fuss and maximum clinical jurisprudence ? In this Information Age, the West would be first to know that story from beginning to end. If they have not cared to use that experience for themselves out of superiority complex, even when the two sets of outcomes are broad daylight, it is as much their responsibility as it is their destiny. In fact their medical administrations have gone about souring on their own few doctors who would see merit in the African model and try to promote them. Do they not know from their medical education that any proven successful medical experience from any where in the world is actually a world good ? After all, these countries were not using woodo medicines, but classical drugs, all from Western research in the past, some award winning and humanity saving and still being used by them, often in conditions related to Covid.
Those vaccinated seniors who did not die had that luck, because many of them took early anti viral medications or took steroids like dexamethasone under prescription at the beginning of the immune phase or were taking regular anti inflammatories/ anti histamines/immuno modulators for their existing conditions that were all protective interventions in this enveloping illness or simply their body had the resilience. Are these factors accounted for in the estimate ? The vaccine created anti bodies can only neutralise the virus and are not therapeutics at any stage of the illness. So, they have to engage the virus. This can happen theoretically on two occasions. At the mucosal gate as the virus is still probing an entry where its load is minimal. It is supposed to grow only within the host cells. Or, having managed to enter it is rapidly growing inside. If the vaccine activity can not work at Gate 1 on low viral loads ( it doesn’t prevent infection in the first place, officially conceded), how can it work later, when the loads are much higher ? Unless that happens, progression into serious illness and even deaths can not be stopped, unless again one of the four situations I mentioned at the start comes into play. Without biological data, evidences and explanations, this number cannot be defended anywhere.
Perfect question!
Philip, can you explain why there ist this difference in the clinical courses as shown in graph 2 and 3 - if interferon antibodies are on their way? If interferon antibodies exist - why might there be once a delayed answer in interferon, and secondly a diminished one?