It occurs to me that the issue is bigger than science; the issue is freedom of speech, freedom of association, etc. Science is just one of many institutions that rely on those freedoms to function properly. Literature, history, entertainment, education, business, democracy, government, and lots of other things need those freedoms to function properly.
The loss of these freedoms has probably been happening a long time, but most of us haven't noticed until the COVID fiasco made it obvious. Most of us haven't felt any need to test our freedoms by moving in directions that our governments don't like. We have been like animals in invisible cages that didn't realize they had lost their freedom.
Very interesting interview. I think that we are living in a very horrible time. Freedom of speech seem to be curtailed at every level, discussions seem to be very difficult, if one isn’t thinking the same way one is being cancelled, discriminated against. Corruption is becoming more and more and seem to become accepted and normal.
I count myself to the thinking few, to the few that accept other peoples opinion, not necessarily agreeing with it. I try and read between the lines.
I have not been vaccinated as it just sounded very fishy saying straight away that those companies have immunity and indemnity. Trying to force everybody to have the needle. I had C. once and it wasn’t pleasant but I still prefer not to have the needle.
I am not anti- vax. I had my tetanus, diphtheria, typhoid, TBE and the occasional flue one and of course all the ones when I was a kid. I have never experienced such a split in society, the aggression of people just believing some scientists chosen by governments as it is now. The complete and utter ignorance to what is going on by still the majority of people.
It is frightening me. I almost lost my job 2 years ago. I was told that I might have to have the needle and the passport if I want to be on the job. So I said that it’s my decision not to and it’s up to them if yes or no. They compromised and it worked out ok. I ended up being infected but carried on with the job and got through it. I stuck to my routines and just got on with the job.
I’m glad to hear that there are people who have knowledge to stand up and say something and push their knowledge. The ones on this plate form know that there are doctors who go the other way and don’t say a word maybe because no balls or getting paid but wathever it is allow the maritime to continue where people get hurt and even die.
Why "Disease X"? Because when the unnecessary 5g towers are raised in sufficient numbers around all around the world they will be in a position to activate the graphene oxide based nanobots, (remember, graphene was in the flu shots before covid), and initiate "Disease X", which will be truly deadly and reduce the world population, their true eugenicist aim. Dr. Philip, I`m curious to know if you watched the short video of the nanobots being destroyed by nicotine ?
When this Covid infection/vaccine dust settles down in an year or two, it would be necessary to correctly define what will be a vaccine functionally, as well as the attributes needed to qualify them for mass/universal vaccination and the timing too. Is it correct to go for mass vaccinations when there is a pandemic that has started ? I don’t know how, when, where and by whom this debate can take place and correct decisions taken for world wide acceptance. These four years have given us ample experience and evidences to arrive at such decisions. But a few things must be fundamental and should be found in medical text books even now. First, if the product can not stop fresh infections substantially in the population, it can not be a vaccine. A vaccine, by definition, must be prophylactic, as we have understood and experienced in these hundred years of mass produced vaccines and their mass use. If the product has a role in preventing the progression of the disease, say from stage A to stage B, it must be considered only as therapeutic for those acquiring the infection and it must compete with other known medications at that time for performance rating and final acceptance. Substantial lab and trial data must be provided by the developing companies and medical authorities like FDA should not short circuit even the EA process. Especially for new respiratory infections from new viruses, doctors should get out of the mindset that no treatment is possible if there are no dedicated anti viral that is readily available or can be readily developed. While the research work to find them must go on, researchers and doctors must quickly go back to past research in related contexts and figure out a basket of medicines from the existing portfolios that will best suit the symptoms. Symptoms contained is half the battle won against the new pathogen. Body can then totally concentrate on the pathogen, instead of expending its attention also on symptoms. In my opinion, there is no symptom today that has not been medically recorded in the context of one disease or the other. For Covid like coronaviruses/RNA viruses, there was already past research, as far back as 2017 if not before, that many known cationic amphiphilic drugs ( CADs) from different indications, were also anti viral, by virtue of their chemical structure features. That is how common molecules like Azithromycin, Montelukast, Levocetrizine , Deslotaridine etc were found to be effective in bulk trials in 2020 itself. Medical schools now must introduce repurposing of existing drugs as a crucial branch of study for medical degrees and post graduations. Most important of all, any large scale successful medicinal experience against new situations must be recognised as a common good world over, regardless of the countries which first created those successful experiences and protocols. They must be readily embraced by everyone, even while looking for improvements in them. From this angle, handling and treatment of Covid infection in the West has been an unmitigated clinical disaster.
It occurs to me that the issue is bigger than science; the issue is freedom of speech, freedom of association, etc. Science is just one of many institutions that rely on those freedoms to function properly. Literature, history, entertainment, education, business, democracy, government, and lots of other things need those freedoms to function properly.
The loss of these freedoms has probably been happening a long time, but most of us haven't noticed until the COVID fiasco made it obvious. Most of us haven't felt any need to test our freedoms by moving in directions that our governments don't like. We have been like animals in invisible cages that didn't realize they had lost their freedom.
It is much better to lose “everything” than auction your soul to the highest bidder.
Very interesting interview. I think that we are living in a very horrible time. Freedom of speech seem to be curtailed at every level, discussions seem to be very difficult, if one isn’t thinking the same way one is being cancelled, discriminated against. Corruption is becoming more and more and seem to become accepted and normal.
I count myself to the thinking few, to the few that accept other peoples opinion, not necessarily agreeing with it. I try and read between the lines.
I have not been vaccinated as it just sounded very fishy saying straight away that those companies have immunity and indemnity. Trying to force everybody to have the needle. I had C. once and it wasn’t pleasant but I still prefer not to have the needle.
I am not anti- vax. I had my tetanus, diphtheria, typhoid, TBE and the occasional flue one and of course all the ones when I was a kid. I have never experienced such a split in society, the aggression of people just believing some scientists chosen by governments as it is now. The complete and utter ignorance to what is going on by still the majority of people.
It is frightening me. I almost lost my job 2 years ago. I was told that I might have to have the needle and the passport if I want to be on the job. So I said that it’s my decision not to and it’s up to them if yes or no. They compromised and it worked out ok. I ended up being infected but carried on with the job and got through it. I stuck to my routines and just got on with the job.
I’m glad to hear that there are people who have knowledge to stand up and say something and push their knowledge. The ones on this plate form know that there are doctors who go the other way and don’t say a word maybe because no balls or getting paid but wathever it is allow the maritime to continue where people get hurt and even die.
Why "Disease X"? Because when the unnecessary 5g towers are raised in sufficient numbers around all around the world they will be in a position to activate the graphene oxide based nanobots, (remember, graphene was in the flu shots before covid), and initiate "Disease X", which will be truly deadly and reduce the world population, their true eugenicist aim. Dr. Philip, I`m curious to know if you watched the short video of the nanobots being destroyed by nicotine ?
When this Covid infection/vaccine dust settles down in an year or two, it would be necessary to correctly define what will be a vaccine functionally, as well as the attributes needed to qualify them for mass/universal vaccination and the timing too. Is it correct to go for mass vaccinations when there is a pandemic that has started ? I don’t know how, when, where and by whom this debate can take place and correct decisions taken for world wide acceptance. These four years have given us ample experience and evidences to arrive at such decisions. But a few things must be fundamental and should be found in medical text books even now. First, if the product can not stop fresh infections substantially in the population, it can not be a vaccine. A vaccine, by definition, must be prophylactic, as we have understood and experienced in these hundred years of mass produced vaccines and their mass use. If the product has a role in preventing the progression of the disease, say from stage A to stage B, it must be considered only as therapeutic for those acquiring the infection and it must compete with other known medications at that time for performance rating and final acceptance. Substantial lab and trial data must be provided by the developing companies and medical authorities like FDA should not short circuit even the EA process. Especially for new respiratory infections from new viruses, doctors should get out of the mindset that no treatment is possible if there are no dedicated anti viral that is readily available or can be readily developed. While the research work to find them must go on, researchers and doctors must quickly go back to past research in related contexts and figure out a basket of medicines from the existing portfolios that will best suit the symptoms. Symptoms contained is half the battle won against the new pathogen. Body can then totally concentrate on the pathogen, instead of expending its attention also on symptoms. In my opinion, there is no symptom today that has not been medically recorded in the context of one disease or the other. For Covid like coronaviruses/RNA viruses, there was already past research, as far back as 2017 if not before, that many known cationic amphiphilic drugs ( CADs) from different indications, were also anti viral, by virtue of their chemical structure features. That is how common molecules like Azithromycin, Montelukast, Levocetrizine , Deslotaridine etc were found to be effective in bulk trials in 2020 itself. Medical schools now must introduce repurposing of existing drugs as a crucial branch of study for medical degrees and post graduations. Most important of all, any large scale successful medicinal experience against new situations must be recognised as a common good world over, regardless of the countries which first created those successful experiences and protocols. They must be readily embraced by everyone, even while looking for improvements in them. From this angle, handling and treatment of Covid infection in the West has been an unmitigated clinical disaster.