I was a fan of hers until I heard of her making public announcements encouraging others to get vaccinated. I believe ALL those who use their public stance to influence followers & non-thinkers about such a significant & personal subject; should be shamed publicly and have their rights to social media limited or taken away completely.
However, I understand that such justice is near non-existent; as too many choose fame, greed, and/or cowardice over integrity, righteousness, and dignity.
I am very very grateful to know that good people like yourself are here with us. 👊🏻
I am confident that God’s Light will prevail. The tide has turned and it’s on its way out, slowly but surely 🔆😇
I would agree that people who pushed the jabs should be called out for that, and certainly celebrities had no business telling other people what to do about their personal decisions for medical treatment, never mind barring unjabbed people from attending their concerts, as many did. (I don't know what is the case in this regard with Celine Dion, I understand she was injured early on and not giving concerts, but certainly it was a common practice in 2021-2022.) And aside from that, they, like the medical professionals and all the many others who pushed the jabs, turned out to have been devastatingly wrong, as we know now that the jabs did zip to stop transmission, zip to stop infection, and they killed and injured millions.
Nonetheless, I cannot agree about taking away such celebrities' social media because the right to free speech is not a privilege; it is a right. The cost of free speech— and it can be a painful one— is that some people (including some celebrities) are going to say some things I might consider totally daft, uninformed, offensive, and maybe even dangerous. So be it. If I want my free speech, I must defend their free speech. The alternative is "Fact Checked" World. We already know what that looks like. Funny, but it looks like what the people who happen to be in power want it to look like.
Finally, I do agree with you, that, as you say, "The tide has turned and it’s on its way out, slowly but surely."
As for Celine Dion, may she find the healing that is best for her.
However, IMO, an eye for an eye & the tit4tat concept is made relevant when nefarious injustices such as this - a planned genocide made possible through lies & propaganda - can be made an exception to that rule of law. ⛓
Hello Jay Em, so who, once rule of law is removed, decides which eye for which eye and which tit for which tat, and on which Tuesday? That sounds to me like a newfangled version of what we've already been living through-- that the health authorities, disregarding everyone's civil rights on the basis of an "emergency," decided to start dictating what they thought best. So who's the new "they" who can decide things outside the framework of the law?
I hear you about wanting justice. I do, too. As for vengeance, personally, I leave that to the judicial system (and with effort, that can be improved), and to the Divine (who sees far more than I can ever imagine).
And I don't know about you, but I really wouldn't want to be in some of these celebrities' shoes right now. Seems to me some of them are getting karma upside the head every which way.
How about you ask that same question to those who were silenced, prosecuted, jailed, beaten up, lost their employment and homes, those who are paralyzed, sickened, and those whose mother was killed by hospital protocols and she did NOT have covid nor any disease.
Obviously; we can’t ask the millions of injected dead people, however, I wonder how their family members would answer your question?
Free speech and planned KILLING are at complete opposite ends of the spectrum here…..
I agree, this is an outrage, the greatest ever against humanity, and as for my appreciating the feelings of those who have been its victims, you can see from my Substack that I have transcribed uncounted hours of heartbreaking testimony from the bereaved and the injured. In fact I have dedicated myself without pay for the past 3 years fulltime to this endeavor of rescuing censored and shadow-banned video documentation. I would very much like to see justice for them all, and I would very much like to see my own rights respected, as they have not been in this criminal fiasco. (May this be so for you also, I do not doubt that you, too, have suffered.)
I would like to see a return, to the degree humanly possible (perfection is not), to the rule of law which, in my country, is determined by the Constitution, which includes a Bill of Rights, beginning with the right to free speech. Again, it is a right, not a privilege— and that has profound, and sometimes very uncomfortable implications.
Perhaps you, and readers here, might find of interest this recent transcript (not yet posted) from an Australian:
TEXT OF TWEET: A note on rights. A lot of talk from people re "What about my RIGHT to feel safe?" That's not how rights work. If it was, it could be used for anything: a rapist could argue for their right to procreate. By definition, rights do not infringe on the rights of another.
TRANSCRIPT OF ATTACHED VIDEO:
MAN SITTING IN A CHAIR IN A KITCHEN: Ever since this whole covid thing began there's been a lot of talk from the pro-vaccine pro-lockdown set about their right to feel safe. They claim that they're correct to demand that the unvaccinated stay at home or be excluded from society because they have a right to feel safe, or to be safe without the unvaccinated imposing themselves upon them.
That's not how rights work and that's not what rights are.
By definition rights do not infringe on the rights held by another. For example, freedom of speech is a right because there's no obligation on anyone to listen, whereas access to healthcare is not a right because it infringes upon the right of another person to do nothing.
Anything that compels another to act is an infringement on that other person's rights.
It doesn't work because any claimed right of this nature can just equally be responded to with, well, what about my right to ignore you? They cancel each other out, and so they can't be logically maintained.
Isaiah Berlin[2] characterized these as positive and negative rights. Freedom of speech is a negative right and access to healthcare is a positive right, that is, it imposes a positive obligation on another to act.
The imposition of positive rights means that one person will always be granted access to something in society that the other person is denied. And that's why they're not rights but privileges.
It's the same with the right to feel safe. It compels the other either act or it denies them their natural rights. The result is either an unequal distribution of rights and obligations in society or, alternatively, it offers an infinite loop of claimed rights. And that's absurd.
1:40
[END]
# # #
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES
[1] From the description of the YouTube channel: "Melbourne lawyer. Freedom is underrated. Evil is real. God is good. Jesus is Lord. I live in Melbourne and have followed our decent into madness with alarmed interest since things started to go haywire in about March 2020. I have found that it is difficult to keep track of everything that happens, as so much of it slips through Twitter posts, Telegram posts and the like. The purpose of this channel is to consolidate as much of it in one place as possible. I have put my own content up which you will find in playlists, and borrow liberally from others. I give credit where I can. Some of the longform videos are of me watching a day's protest and switching between perspectives depending on what is happening."
[2] For more about philosopher and political theorist Isaiah Berlin (1909-1997), see:
Informative immunological analysis from Dr. Rennebohm. But my argument against all of this is simple: Clearly, SARS-CoV-2 is a synthetic virus of some sort. Why wouldn't all the variants be as well?
As a note, most smart thinkers on this point to Omicron as so divergent from the original strain as if it was 'kept in a lab freezer' for two years. Why should we assume any of the variants evolved? Wouldn't a consistent pathogenic evolution suggest a line of consistent pathogenic synthetic viruses? Maybe GVB's prediction are just a fancy cover story for a progression of evil creations.
I feel SARS cov-2 virus is a thing of the past , regardless of its origin. It spawned 4-5 variants, upto delta, the most virulent of all. Omicron, from very early 2022 , is a completely new virus, of the same family if you like and we can call it SARS Cov-3. It could have coexisted, even in individuals, with delta for some time in 2022, before driving it out and taking stranglehold. With no change in important behaviour, including mildness and immune escaping, the variants, from time to time, are only technical occurrences. In all probabilities, Omicron was of human origin and thus could spread very easily. That feature itself was a natural design to create safe bulk immunity, but repeat m-RNA vaccinations in the West screwed up that natural course to its sunset and provided for its extended lease in the populations there. It did ease into sunset by end 2022 in many societies that gave up on repeat vaccinations.
This flow chart is fine, but why are we talking about only NABs ( from vaccines) and suspecting that they do not neutralise the virus, leading to more infectious variants via PNABs etc. Are we seeing infection spread continuing to rage in highly vaccinated populations ? Yes, testing has largely stopped and no case counting also, but are doctors seeing more patients with common respiratory symptoms and how does it compare to the past years ? The path to the ultimate virus ( GVB’s end point) has to traverse these occurrences. We must formally get the collective observations of thousands of every day doctors to assess where we stand in this flow chart. How to mobilise this patient information gathering ? Whatever, the doctors and the population should not forget the first lesson - nipping the virus in the bud with early, classical treatments on symptoms. This personal intervention, attending medicinally to the symptoms immediately and without ignoring them, whatever be the virus infection, remains cardinally important atleast for the next two years. Mercifully, rampant revaccinations have stopped and so the adverse effect of lingering NABs on the biology of the virus will slowly recede, giving the virus the scope to be not active in mutating and letting it disappear in the horizon slowly on its own. Don’t keep teasing the virus and GVB too will agree that in that case, this flow chart will take a different turn for the good of the population, from wherever it is now.
I think he has identified an important component of what “is” currently happening and what will be presenting when we get to stage 13 of the immune escape viruses evolution. It appears to be happening now among the vaccinated people I know. They are just getting sick ALL the time with all kinds of things. The autoimmune component of the vaccine’s adverse reactions appears like it will play a major role in the coming immune escape virus. What ever is the case: There is NO way to delay that trouble coming every day to our world.
I would urge Dr GVB, as also Dr. McMillan, to also focus on helping those who are already trapped in this conundrum, with treatment recommendations that would stop their progression and aid in recovery. Actually that is the most important part. They can mobilise a group of international clinicians for working this out. Is it possible that some existing, well profiled vaccines act as therapeutics, by neutralising the NABs from the covid vaccines.
Thanks for the link. I have seen it earlier, a few weeks ago, even had lot of conversations there. I said the same thing, treat well and early and don’t allow viral load build up. I don’t think the super variant at the end of this flow chart can be worse than delta in virulence. And the world has now enough experience trashing it and handling the symptoms and conditions associated with it very effectively with old school medicines. There is no reason why this new anticipated one too cannot be handled similarly. The additional point now are the damages from the residual NABs and ways must be quickly researched to get rid of them. These two are the triggers by their presence and once eliminated, body should restore its immune balance. The exaggerated autoimmune conditions now present in many should then disappear on their own. The physicians and researchers among you all, please focus on this point. By blowing continuously hot on administrations, we are only draining our energies needed for other fronts. The administration anywhere is not going to punish itself for its lapses hitherto. But I am confident that they have learnt their lessons and next time, this kind of lop sided response will not be repeated. Even China will not resort to its mystery and military response.
From what I understand, once infection of the immune escape virus begins in an immune system altered person, it will almost be too late for medical intervention to be successful. Viral loads cannot be managed in an immune system that offers NO resistance to the virus. And with the intense medical management required by the resulting cytokine storms that will most likely occur in vaccinated folks with a damaged by somewhat active immune system will not be practical on large scale. The drugs for this management exist in only limited quantities. Combine this with a health care system that ceases to function as doctors, nurses and staff fall ill from their exposure to this virus. The only option for vaccinated is the prophylactic use of antivirals to “not get” the infection. I don’t think we have the necessary understanding of the complexities of the immune system to made any repairs possible. We are facing a mass extinction like event that cannot be stopped. Adverse reactions and auto immunity from the injections combined with the coming escape virus will kill nearly every MRNA vaccinated human on the planet. I wish this was not true. But it is.
I am not from medicine, but an organic chemist ( 78, PhD, long retired from industry R&D), with a lot of reading interest in medicinal chemistry in my recent years of retirement). I know from my India expereince in 2021, after being battered for a while by Delta, the virus was irreversibly buried by classical URT drugs like Azithromycin, Montelukast, Levocetrizine and the like which are also anti virals additionally by virtue of their chemical structure features. To this lot, you could also off label antivirals like Ivermectin and HCQ. According to my premise, this chemical structure derived additional anti viral property exists in hundreds of common drugs from many different indications. The medical world has already a war chest of them. A few of them, in some combinations, could always be trained on any virus variant in the present case. I am highlighting these in some detail only to bring home the point that these stand alone molecules directly interact with the virus by electrostatic interactions and render their spikes ineffective. The mechanism does not depend on the intervention by our immune systems. In this scenario, the immune evasion of the virus is only a side note. As I grossly visualise, this drug ( small molecules) - virus interaction is direct and on the target. Like the vaccine, new anti virals promoted by big pharma in the West in this pandemic, need the route of our immune activity, that is why they have been largely poor in performance. I agree prophylactic use of off label antivirals like ivermectin are very effective, like a good, safe vaccine, in terms of value. But difficult to implement in whole populations, though attempted in some parts of India with some success against delta. The therapeutic options are the best and very effective when used early, because they target only the affected individuals. I have repeatedly highlighted one advantage ( not perceived by any so far in my understanding)in this early medicinal intervention approach. In dozens of comments. It is this. In a family, if the first receives this early medicinal care, mostly in home care, his viral load build up will be heavily curtailed, so low that he may not effectively transmit it to his household members. They, in the meantime, get natural immunity by passive exposure and without getting sick. No vaccinations and for a few dollars of common medicines, the family is immune. Over thousands of households in a community, this is herd immunity, clean, strong, long lasting and painlessly achieved. No serious illnesses, no hospitalisations, no nothing. Sweden was right in keeping the society open in the early months of 2020 aiming to create herd immunity, but blundered by not considering early treatment options for the infected. No firewalls around the virus. Every infected became a spreader thus. It was a disaster. Just a week long course of early URT medicines would have made Sweden a completely different story.
Thanks for your prompt and educative response. I agree that there is a cohort among the highly vaccinated ( until recently) population that are trapped in the sequence highlighted. They are all patients of different orders and different presentations and hopefully receiving appropriate treatments. At the stage they are in in this flow, their recovery can be guided and ensured only by more clinically sound medicinal approaches. An extra focus on their medications must involve getting rid of the virus reservoirs they are holding - kind of treating them for Covid infections with protocols like the ones developed by Dr. Shankara Chetty. In fact, through this box, I would request him to advise on such a measure. The other culprit here is the lingering NABs and PNABs. Is some detoxification of these possible medicinally ? It is all chemistry and theoretically it should be possible. I would request some intrepid medicinal chemistry researchers to undertake this exploration, starting with the identification of the structures and active segments of the NABs. This must be done, at stake is the welfare of hundreds of thousands of patients struggling with their daily lives from the illnesses.
Your hypothesis on the iceberg seems to somewhat contradict Geert’s Hivicron hypothesis if I understand correctly? I have to say I find the high rates of slow burning chronic illness and death to be much more believable than this fast three month death wave followed by herd immunity. But what has changed your thinking as we are only 5 days away from Geert’s end of June ‘deadline’. And by the way I agree the worst thing he could do was keep putting dates, but while he has said don’t pay attention to dates you can’t say that after you say you are 99% certain
I've been through the prepping thing... spent a fortune on what I eventually realized was delusional thinking....
Regarding hunting ... I lived in Central Otago for 6 years ... there are no limits on how many deer you want to shoot.... however on government land where anyone can hunt... unless you are hunting land that is remote ... you will not find any deer... they are not stupid -- they hear the rifles firing ... and the people ... and they stay away...
I would hunt on private stations (farms)... my neighbour was the game keeper on one of these.... the only way to access was to drive up some very rough roads then use an ATV... even then poachers remain a huge problem.
He has motion sensors and cameras on all the access points and gets alerts when poachers are on the property ... he then has to go out and deal with them (he's a big unit - former pro rugby player)
Now imagine even in a place like NZ where deer have no natural predators and are considered a pest.... the economy collapses... no petro chemicals to fertilize and spray pesticides on the crops... nothing will grow....
Everyone with a gun will shoot and kill everything that moves.... the deer will move even further from where the people are.... how do you get to them when there is no petrol available? Do you walk 20 miles... shoot some deer ... then carry them out?
The deer are plentiful .. but so were the bison and other wildlife in North America... and uncontrolled hunting soon left most species of big game on the precipice of extinction.
There will very quickly be nothing left to shoot - and what remains will be too far from you to bother trying to hunt...
Solar? So you have lights? That won't keep you alive... you will be starving ...
Water purification chemicals will run out... while you are starving...
I suggest you pick up some books about pioneers moving in Canada and the US... hard experienced men and women ...not feeble modern man who has never known a hard day in his life... who drives to the corner store to pick up food... these hard men suffered horribly much of the time... they were often on the verge of starvation...
It is wishful thinking to expect to survive total collapse. Borderline delusional.
The only people who are positioned well to survive this would be remote hunter gatherer tribes.... perhaps you might consider trying to join one of them? Oh right ... f789 that... nobody wants to live like that....
I would advise against it ... the spent fuel ponds will get them
Nobody survives. Nobody. This is an extinction event
Thank you for your words. I have a question... Can it be something similar for not vaccinated but with a weak inmune system? My kids are getting sick so often... They have had COVID 4 times or more, have a lot of fatigue, join pains, headaches...
I’m not a doctor and this is not medical advice but you could consider getting their vitamin D levels checked. Also, if they are in school they may be constantly exposed to sick, vax damaged children and teachers. Just some things to think about.
Supplements... take as many as you can afford...my list is C, D, zinc, B12, fish oil, magnesium, minerals, and a few others.... do not consume processed foods... seed oils... exercise...
Wonderful video and breakdown. Thank you so much for this important work.
Appreciated
Thank you kindly Dr McMillan.
I hope Celine Dion hears you.
I was a fan of hers until I heard of her making public announcements encouraging others to get vaccinated. I believe ALL those who use their public stance to influence followers & non-thinkers about such a significant & personal subject; should be shamed publicly and have their rights to social media limited or taken away completely.
However, I understand that such justice is near non-existent; as too many choose fame, greed, and/or cowardice over integrity, righteousness, and dignity.
I am very very grateful to know that good people like yourself are here with us. 👊🏻
I am confident that God’s Light will prevail. The tide has turned and it’s on its way out, slowly but surely 🔆😇
Be blessed, be well, Dr M.
#inGodwetrust
#mediaisthevirus
#trudeau4treason
I would agree that people who pushed the jabs should be called out for that, and certainly celebrities had no business telling other people what to do about their personal decisions for medical treatment, never mind barring unjabbed people from attending their concerts, as many did. (I don't know what is the case in this regard with Celine Dion, I understand she was injured early on and not giving concerts, but certainly it was a common practice in 2021-2022.) And aside from that, they, like the medical professionals and all the many others who pushed the jabs, turned out to have been devastatingly wrong, as we know now that the jabs did zip to stop transmission, zip to stop infection, and they killed and injured millions.
Nonetheless, I cannot agree about taking away such celebrities' social media because the right to free speech is not a privilege; it is a right. The cost of free speech— and it can be a painful one— is that some people (including some celebrities) are going to say some things I might consider totally daft, uninformed, offensive, and maybe even dangerous. So be it. If I want my free speech, I must defend their free speech. The alternative is "Fact Checked" World. We already know what that looks like. Funny, but it looks like what the people who happen to be in power want it to look like.
Finally, I do agree with you, that, as you say, "The tide has turned and it’s on its way out, slowly but surely."
As for Celine Dion, may she find the healing that is best for her.
Yes, I agree and thank you for sharing.
Free speech MUST BE free speech for ALL!
However, IMO, an eye for an eye & the tit4tat concept is made relevant when nefarious injustices such as this - a planned genocide made possible through lies & propaganda - can be made an exception to that rule of law. ⛓
#trudeau4treason
Hello Jay Em, so who, once rule of law is removed, decides which eye for which eye and which tit for which tat, and on which Tuesday? That sounds to me like a newfangled version of what we've already been living through-- that the health authorities, disregarding everyone's civil rights on the basis of an "emergency," decided to start dictating what they thought best. So who's the new "they" who can decide things outside the framework of the law?
I hear you about wanting justice. I do, too. As for vengeance, personally, I leave that to the judicial system (and with effort, that can be improved), and to the Divine (who sees far more than I can ever imagine).
And I don't know about you, but I really wouldn't want to be in some of these celebrities' shoes right now. Seems to me some of them are getting karma upside the head every which way.
Who gets to decide??
How about you ask that same question to those who were silenced, prosecuted, jailed, beaten up, lost their employment and homes, those who are paralyzed, sickened, and those whose mother was killed by hospital protocols and she did NOT have covid nor any disease.
Obviously; we can’t ask the millions of injected dead people, however, I wonder how their family members would answer your question?
Free speech and planned KILLING are at complete opposite ends of the spectrum here…..
#nurembergcode
I agree, this is an outrage, the greatest ever against humanity, and as for my appreciating the feelings of those who have been its victims, you can see from my Substack that I have transcribed uncounted hours of heartbreaking testimony from the bereaved and the injured. In fact I have dedicated myself without pay for the past 3 years fulltime to this endeavor of rescuing censored and shadow-banned video documentation. I would very much like to see justice for them all, and I would very much like to see my own rights respected, as they have not been in this criminal fiasco. (May this be so for you also, I do not doubt that you, too, have suffered.)
I would like to see a return, to the degree humanly possible (perfection is not), to the rule of law which, in my country, is determined by the Constitution, which includes a Bill of Rights, beginning with the right to free speech. Again, it is a right, not a privilege— and that has profound, and sometimes very uncomfortable implications.
Perhaps you, and readers here, might find of interest this recent transcript (not yet posted) from an Australian:
Wolfgang Amadeus Keen
@Wolfgang_Keen , January 7, 2022
https://twitter.com/Wolfgang_Keen/status/1479364059715698688
Same video is also posted at
A Note on Rights, Wolfang Amadeus Keen, Jan 7, 2022 [1]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2nYkaIzbuE
TEXT OF TWEET: A note on rights. A lot of talk from people re "What about my RIGHT to feel safe?" That's not how rights work. If it was, it could be used for anything: a rapist could argue for their right to procreate. By definition, rights do not infringe on the rights of another.
TRANSCRIPT OF ATTACHED VIDEO:
MAN SITTING IN A CHAIR IN A KITCHEN: Ever since this whole covid thing began there's been a lot of talk from the pro-vaccine pro-lockdown set about their right to feel safe. They claim that they're correct to demand that the unvaccinated stay at home or be excluded from society because they have a right to feel safe, or to be safe without the unvaccinated imposing themselves upon them.
That's not how rights work and that's not what rights are.
By definition rights do not infringe on the rights held by another. For example, freedom of speech is a right because there's no obligation on anyone to listen, whereas access to healthcare is not a right because it infringes upon the right of another person to do nothing.
Anything that compels another to act is an infringement on that other person's rights.
It doesn't work because any claimed right of this nature can just equally be responded to with, well, what about my right to ignore you? They cancel each other out, and so they can't be logically maintained.
Isaiah Berlin[2] characterized these as positive and negative rights. Freedom of speech is a negative right and access to healthcare is a positive right, that is, it imposes a positive obligation on another to act.
The imposition of positive rights means that one person will always be granted access to something in society that the other person is denied. And that's why they're not rights but privileges.
It's the same with the right to feel safe. It compels the other either act or it denies them their natural rights. The result is either an unequal distribution of rights and obligations in society or, alternatively, it offers an infinite loop of claimed rights. And that's absurd.
1:40
[END]
# # #
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES
[1] From the description of the YouTube channel: "Melbourne lawyer. Freedom is underrated. Evil is real. God is good. Jesus is Lord. I live in Melbourne and have followed our decent into madness with alarmed interest since things started to go haywire in about March 2020. I have found that it is difficult to keep track of everything that happens, as so much of it slips through Twitter posts, Telegram posts and the like. The purpose of this channel is to consolidate as much of it in one place as possible. I have put my own content up which you will find in playlists, and borrow liberally from others. I give credit where I can. Some of the longform videos are of me watching a day's protest and switching between perspectives depending on what is happening."
[2] For more about philosopher and political theorist Isaiah Berlin (1909-1997), see:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/berlin/
Thank you.
Was she plugging the shots before or after her vax injury?
Thank u all!🙏🏻💕
Informative immunological analysis from Dr. Rennebohm. But my argument against all of this is simple: Clearly, SARS-CoV-2 is a synthetic virus of some sort. Why wouldn't all the variants be as well?
As a note, most smart thinkers on this point to Omicron as so divergent from the original strain as if it was 'kept in a lab freezer' for two years. Why should we assume any of the variants evolved? Wouldn't a consistent pathogenic evolution suggest a line of consistent pathogenic synthetic viruses? Maybe GVB's prediction are just a fancy cover story for a progression of evil creations.
I feel SARS cov-2 virus is a thing of the past , regardless of its origin. It spawned 4-5 variants, upto delta, the most virulent of all. Omicron, from very early 2022 , is a completely new virus, of the same family if you like and we can call it SARS Cov-3. It could have coexisted, even in individuals, with delta for some time in 2022, before driving it out and taking stranglehold. With no change in important behaviour, including mildness and immune escaping, the variants, from time to time, are only technical occurrences. In all probabilities, Omicron was of human origin and thus could spread very easily. That feature itself was a natural design to create safe bulk immunity, but repeat m-RNA vaccinations in the West screwed up that natural course to its sunset and provided for its extended lease in the populations there. It did ease into sunset by end 2022 in many societies that gave up on repeat vaccinations.
This flow chart is fine, but why are we talking about only NABs ( from vaccines) and suspecting that they do not neutralise the virus, leading to more infectious variants via PNABs etc. Are we seeing infection spread continuing to rage in highly vaccinated populations ? Yes, testing has largely stopped and no case counting also, but are doctors seeing more patients with common respiratory symptoms and how does it compare to the past years ? The path to the ultimate virus ( GVB’s end point) has to traverse these occurrences. We must formally get the collective observations of thousands of every day doctors to assess where we stand in this flow chart. How to mobilise this patient information gathering ? Whatever, the doctors and the population should not forget the first lesson - nipping the virus in the bud with early, classical treatments on symptoms. This personal intervention, attending medicinally to the symptoms immediately and without ignoring them, whatever be the virus infection, remains cardinally important atleast for the next two years. Mercifully, rampant revaccinations have stopped and so the adverse effect of lingering NABs on the biology of the virus will slowly recede, giving the virus the scope to be not active in mutating and letting it disappear in the horizon slowly on its own. Don’t keep teasing the virus and GVB too will agree that in that case, this flow chart will take a different turn for the good of the population, from wherever it is now.
I think he has identified an important component of what “is” currently happening and what will be presenting when we get to stage 13 of the immune escape viruses evolution. It appears to be happening now among the vaccinated people I know. They are just getting sick ALL the time with all kinds of things. The autoimmune component of the vaccine’s adverse reactions appears like it will play a major role in the coming immune escape virus. What ever is the case: There is NO way to delay that trouble coming every day to our world.
I would urge Dr GVB, as also Dr. McMillan, to also focus on helping those who are already trapped in this conundrum, with treatment recommendations that would stop their progression and aid in recovery. Actually that is the most important part. They can mobilise a group of international clinicians for working this out. Is it possible that some existing, well profiled vaccines act as therapeutics, by neutralising the NABs from the covid vaccines.
Here is an important video for you to watch in regard to the clinical scenarios of dealing with an active immune escape virus in the population. https://open.substack.com/pub/philipmcmillan/p/potential-clinical-implications-of?r=gjogf&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Thanks for the link. I have seen it earlier, a few weeks ago, even had lot of conversations there. I said the same thing, treat well and early and don’t allow viral load build up. I don’t think the super variant at the end of this flow chart can be worse than delta in virulence. And the world has now enough experience trashing it and handling the symptoms and conditions associated with it very effectively with old school medicines. There is no reason why this new anticipated one too cannot be handled similarly. The additional point now are the damages from the residual NABs and ways must be quickly researched to get rid of them. These two are the triggers by their presence and once eliminated, body should restore its immune balance. The exaggerated autoimmune conditions now present in many should then disappear on their own. The physicians and researchers among you all, please focus on this point. By blowing continuously hot on administrations, we are only draining our energies needed for other fronts. The administration anywhere is not going to punish itself for its lapses hitherto. But I am confident that they have learnt their lessons and next time, this kind of lop sided response will not be repeated. Even China will not resort to its mystery and military response.
From what I understand, once infection of the immune escape virus begins in an immune system altered person, it will almost be too late for medical intervention to be successful. Viral loads cannot be managed in an immune system that offers NO resistance to the virus. And with the intense medical management required by the resulting cytokine storms that will most likely occur in vaccinated folks with a damaged by somewhat active immune system will not be practical on large scale. The drugs for this management exist in only limited quantities. Combine this with a health care system that ceases to function as doctors, nurses and staff fall ill from their exposure to this virus. The only option for vaccinated is the prophylactic use of antivirals to “not get” the infection. I don’t think we have the necessary understanding of the complexities of the immune system to made any repairs possible. We are facing a mass extinction like event that cannot be stopped. Adverse reactions and auto immunity from the injections combined with the coming escape virus will kill nearly every MRNA vaccinated human on the planet. I wish this was not true. But it is.
I am not from medicine, but an organic chemist ( 78, PhD, long retired from industry R&D), with a lot of reading interest in medicinal chemistry in my recent years of retirement). I know from my India expereince in 2021, after being battered for a while by Delta, the virus was irreversibly buried by classical URT drugs like Azithromycin, Montelukast, Levocetrizine and the like which are also anti virals additionally by virtue of their chemical structure features. To this lot, you could also off label antivirals like Ivermectin and HCQ. According to my premise, this chemical structure derived additional anti viral property exists in hundreds of common drugs from many different indications. The medical world has already a war chest of them. A few of them, in some combinations, could always be trained on any virus variant in the present case. I am highlighting these in some detail only to bring home the point that these stand alone molecules directly interact with the virus by electrostatic interactions and render their spikes ineffective. The mechanism does not depend on the intervention by our immune systems. In this scenario, the immune evasion of the virus is only a side note. As I grossly visualise, this drug ( small molecules) - virus interaction is direct and on the target. Like the vaccine, new anti virals promoted by big pharma in the West in this pandemic, need the route of our immune activity, that is why they have been largely poor in performance. I agree prophylactic use of off label antivirals like ivermectin are very effective, like a good, safe vaccine, in terms of value. But difficult to implement in whole populations, though attempted in some parts of India with some success against delta. The therapeutic options are the best and very effective when used early, because they target only the affected individuals. I have repeatedly highlighted one advantage ( not perceived by any so far in my understanding)in this early medicinal intervention approach. In dozens of comments. It is this. In a family, if the first receives this early medicinal care, mostly in home care, his viral load build up will be heavily curtailed, so low that he may not effectively transmit it to his household members. They, in the meantime, get natural immunity by passive exposure and without getting sick. No vaccinations and for a few dollars of common medicines, the family is immune. Over thousands of households in a community, this is herd immunity, clean, strong, long lasting and painlessly achieved. No serious illnesses, no hospitalisations, no nothing. Sweden was right in keeping the society open in the early months of 2020 aiming to create herd immunity, but blundered by not considering early treatment options for the infected. No firewalls around the virus. Every infected became a spreader thus. It was a disaster. Just a week long course of early URT medicines would have made Sweden a completely different story.
I would suggest the lucky ones will be the ones who die quickly, early.
Thanks for your prompt and educative response. I agree that there is a cohort among the highly vaccinated ( until recently) population that are trapped in the sequence highlighted. They are all patients of different orders and different presentations and hopefully receiving appropriate treatments. At the stage they are in in this flow, their recovery can be guided and ensured only by more clinically sound medicinal approaches. An extra focus on their medications must involve getting rid of the virus reservoirs they are holding - kind of treating them for Covid infections with protocols like the ones developed by Dr. Shankara Chetty. In fact, through this box, I would request him to advise on such a measure. The other culprit here is the lingering NABs and PNABs. Is some detoxification of these possible medicinally ? It is all chemistry and theoretically it should be possible. I would request some intrepid medicinal chemistry researchers to undertake this exploration, starting with the identification of the structures and active segments of the NABs. This must be done, at stake is the welfare of hundreds of thousands of patients struggling with their daily lives from the illnesses.
Your hypothesis on the iceberg seems to somewhat contradict Geert’s Hivicron hypothesis if I understand correctly? I have to say I find the high rates of slow burning chronic illness and death to be much more believable than this fast three month death wave followed by herd immunity. But what has changed your thinking as we are only 5 days away from Geert’s end of June ‘deadline’. And by the way I agree the worst thing he could do was keep putting dates, but while he has said don’t pay attention to dates you can’t say that after you say you are 99% certain
I've been through the prepping thing... spent a fortune on what I eventually realized was delusional thinking....
Regarding hunting ... I lived in Central Otago for 6 years ... there are no limits on how many deer you want to shoot.... however on government land where anyone can hunt... unless you are hunting land that is remote ... you will not find any deer... they are not stupid -- they hear the rifles firing ... and the people ... and they stay away...
I would hunt on private stations (farms)... my neighbour was the game keeper on one of these.... the only way to access was to drive up some very rough roads then use an ATV... even then poachers remain a huge problem.
He has motion sensors and cameras on all the access points and gets alerts when poachers are on the property ... he then has to go out and deal with them (he's a big unit - former pro rugby player)
Now imagine even in a place like NZ where deer have no natural predators and are considered a pest.... the economy collapses... no petro chemicals to fertilize and spray pesticides on the crops... nothing will grow....
Everyone with a gun will shoot and kill everything that moves.... the deer will move even further from where the people are.... how do you get to them when there is no petrol available? Do you walk 20 miles... shoot some deer ... then carry them out?
The deer are plentiful .. but so were the bison and other wildlife in North America... and uncontrolled hunting soon left most species of big game on the precipice of extinction.
There will very quickly be nothing left to shoot - and what remains will be too far from you to bother trying to hunt...
Solar? So you have lights? That won't keep you alive... you will be starving ...
Water purification chemicals will run out... while you are starving...
I suggest you pick up some books about pioneers moving in Canada and the US... hard experienced men and women ...not feeble modern man who has never known a hard day in his life... who drives to the corner store to pick up food... these hard men suffered horribly much of the time... they were often on the verge of starvation...
It is wishful thinking to expect to survive total collapse. Borderline delusional.
The only people who are positioned well to survive this would be remote hunter gatherer tribes.... perhaps you might consider trying to join one of them? Oh right ... f789 that... nobody wants to live like that....
I would advise against it ... the spent fuel ponds will get them
Nobody survives. Nobody. This is an extinction event
https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/the-utter-futility-of-doomsday-prepping
They must be getting concerned that the Bossche Mutation has not arrived... the last thing they want is for the collapse to precede the extinction...
https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/what-cannot-continue-will-stop
https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/central-banks-are-in-a-huge-bind
https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/the-ultimate-extinction-plan-uep
knowing little bit more the language of the elites, Bossche being part of it. here is what we see:
stage 13?? what a very special number!
HIV-I-CRON, just like HIV, continuous infections....
https://mejbcart.substack.com/p/how-much-hiv-is-in-sars-cov-2-faucis
Thank you for your words. I have a question... Can it be something similar for not vaccinated but with a weak inmune system? My kids are getting sick so often... They have had COVID 4 times or more, have a lot of fatigue, join pains, headaches...
I’m not a doctor and this is not medical advice but you could consider getting their vitamin D levels checked. Also, if they are in school they may be constantly exposed to sick, vax damaged children and teachers. Just some things to think about.
Supplements... take as many as you can afford...my list is C, D, zinc, B12, fish oil, magnesium, minerals, and a few others.... do not consume processed foods... seed oils... exercise...