It is interesting that the Lancet was so swift in assessing this preprint as having a technical problem, which I can’t imagine is true with the authors in question. I wonder who it was in the Lancet who took this decision and what their qualifications are. Alas science doesn’t work on discussion anymore, just censorship. Meanwhile the Na…
It is interesting that the Lancet was so swift in assessing this preprint as having a technical problem, which I can’t imagine is true with the authors in question. I wonder who it was in the Lancet who took this decision and what their qualifications are. Alas science doesn’t work on discussion anymore, just censorship. Meanwhile the Naked Emperor Substack reports revelations by the chief British architect of the government nudge policy deployed during the pandemic. Nudge happened, just like in the Nazi era and still is but the actions of the Lancet and social media is not nudge, it is blatant censorship to eliminate opposition to their nefarious narrative.
It is interesting that the Lancet was so swift in assessing this preprint as having a technical problem, which I can’t imagine is true with the authors in question. I wonder who it was in the Lancet who took this decision and what their qualifications are. Alas science doesn’t work on discussion anymore, just censorship. Meanwhile the Naked Emperor Substack reports revelations by the chief British architect of the government nudge policy deployed during the pandemic. Nudge happened, just like in the Nazi era and still is but the actions of the Lancet and social media is not nudge, it is blatant censorship to eliminate opposition to their nefarious narrative.
Appreciated