Dr McMillan - your first sentence is spot on! I'd like to think the reputation of gov't agencies is in the toilet, but too many are invested in the lies. They'll believe anything.
I used to work in pharma. One of the jobs I had involved communicating externally, explaining the business. Of course some details were commercially sensitive, and couldn’t be shared. For vaccines, these usually related to price, volumes we could manufacture, and contracting with payors.
Tell you what was NEVER commercially sensitive though: pharmacovigilence data. It had to be reported to the regulators, and if necessary, the product would have its safety label updated, or it could end up being withdrawn from the market.
Dr McMillan - your first sentence is spot on! I'd like to think the reputation of gov't agencies is in the toilet, but too many are invested in the lies. They'll believe anything.
Appreciated.
I used to work in pharma. One of the jobs I had involved communicating externally, explaining the business. Of course some details were commercially sensitive, and couldn’t be shared. For vaccines, these usually related to price, volumes we could manufacture, and contracting with payors.
Tell you what was NEVER commercially sensitive though: pharmacovigilence data. It had to be reported to the regulators, and if necessary, the product would have its safety label updated, or it could end up being withdrawn from the market.
Valuable input.
same reason admitting that most of the 5.8 million kids with "long COVID" actually have "long Vax"... https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/cbs-news-up-to-58-million-kids-have?r=8ypo0&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true
Long vax - well said!
Talk about trying to muddy the waters. She must think we're all stupid.