Why was a vaccine not developed against SARS-COV?
This question recently came to me as I reflected on the current state of the pandemic and increased excess mortality across the globe. What was the issue with vaccines for SARS-COV?
Whilst SARS-COV2 is a novel coronavirus virus, it has 80% similarity to the original SARS-COV virus which caused the epidemic in 2003. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) first emerged in China and spread to 4 other countries. It had a case fatality rate of about 3%.
Link to WHO information on SARS >
The need for development of a vaccine was recognised.
Because of a concern for reemergence or a deliberate release of the SARS coronavirus, vaccine development was initiated.
- Tseng, Chien-Te, et al. "Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus." PloS one 7.4 (2012): e35421.
A number of vaccine candidates were tested on non-human primates, ferrets and mice. The animals were sacrificed to test for antibody level responses and another cohort were sacrificed after challenge tests, on re-exposure to the virus.
What are challenge studies? This indicates that the vaccinated animals are deliberately exposed to virus in order to understand the immune response on re-exposure to the virus.
Vaccine candidates for SARS-COV
Inactivated whole virus vaccine with and without alum adjuvant
Virus-Like Particle vaccine
Mohsen, M.O., Bachmann, M.F. Virus-like particle vaccinology, from bench to bedside. Cell Mol Immunol 19, 993–1011 (2022)Recombinant DNA produced S protein (could be considered the closest to mRNA technology)
What was the conclusion from the vaccine trial?
These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.
- Tseng, Chien-Te, et al. "Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus." PloS one 7.4 (2012): e35421.
Repeated, “caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-COV vaccine in humans is indicated.”
The results from this paper should have been available to scientists at the time. Perhaps the decision to use mRNA technology may have been made because it was hoped the outcomes would be different.
The NIH definition of Type 2 hypersensitivity.
Type II hypersensitivity reaction refers to an antibody-mediated immune reaction in which antibodies (IgG or IgM) are directed against cellular or extracellular matrix antigens, resulting in cellular destruction, functional loss, or tissue damage.
Link to further information on Type II hypersensitivity >
Type 2 hypersensitivity responses are my major concern. In this situation, antibodies produced against the virus target proteins on the surface of cells leading to inflammation.
As shown, all animals exhibited pathologic changes after challenge including those animals with no measurable virus on day two suggesting virus infection had occurred but was not detectable on day two because of a short duration of infection or neutralization of virus by antibody in the lung during processing.
- Tseng, Chien-Te, et al. "Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus." PloS one 7.4 (2012): e35421.
If Type II hypersensitivity responses are also occurring today with current vaccines, the only way of knowing this is through detailed autopsies on vaccinated deaths. Currently, minimal such autopsies have been done (I could find only 29 published up till spring 2022) after 12 billion vaccine doses delivered.
Doesn’t the scientific community want to know the answer?
The science was already well known. Previous attempts to bring a SARS-CoV vaccine to market failed as had previous mRNA attempts - all due to safety concerns. Pathology studies have been done in Germany and reported - see https://odysee.com/@en:a5/Pathology-Conference_Burkhardt_Presentation_EN_20220311:7
Why any Dr/scientist is still supportive of ongoing jabs in any form beggars belief and can only be ascribed to deliberately ignoring their Hippocratic Oath to "first do no harm".
Why was a ‘vaccine solution’ to SARS-CoV-2 ever initiated?
It was known from the beginning that ‘the virus’/Covid-19 wasn’t a serious threat to most people, so how did we end up with this INSANE plan to jab the entire world population?
Why was the scientific and medical establishment so willing to go along with this plan to exploit the entire population with this medical intervention that wasn’t needed for most people, and was unlikely to work in the vulnerable due to immunosenescence?
This is a massive crime - innocent members of the global community, including children, have been pressured, coerced and manipulated to sacrifice their natural immune response to defective ‘leaky vaccines’.
Time for accountability.