20 Comments
User's avatar
Henry Engelking's avatar

Dr. McMillan, short direct question. Why are health authorities still recommending the mRNA vaccines when the risks are now clear and significant?

Expand full comment
Dr Philip McMillan's avatar

Not sure.

Maybe the implications of acknowledgement are too great.

Huge legal and financial ramifications.

Expand full comment
Henry Engelking's avatar

That makes sense. What this says about human beings is hard to accept. I will admit I have never been more afraid of anything more in my life. Not for my well being, I refused the mRNA vaccines.

Expand full comment
Lawyerlisa's avatar

Do you differentiate between astrazeneca and mRNA? Do you have any thoughts on those who've only had one mRNA? Thanks

Expand full comment
Dr Philip McMillan's avatar

There are a number of variables here:

- were you a responder in the first place (up to about 15% are non-responders

- Lower probability for triggering interferon autoantibodies

- Unlikely to have tolerant IgG4

- IgG4 is also most likely to happen with Moderna.

Expand full comment
krishna e bera's avatar

I didnt see IgG4 mentioned anywhere in that paper, but i am in the dark about the various terms and mechanisms. Is downregulation of CD19 expression in B-cells the same as IgG4-related tolerance?

Expand full comment
Mark Luersen's avatar

I am not entirely convinced that 'natural immunity prevents recurrent infection', especially with new variants. Before the vaccine rollout, I remember reading articles of people who contracted covid more than once, weeks or even months apart. Worse still- what if sars-cov-2 is a gain of function bioweapon spliced and diced with HIV and persists in the body when, or if, it takes a hold?

Expand full comment
Dr Philip McMillan's avatar

Many misunderstand the science around natural immunity.

It will not prevent an infection from Omicron but shortens the duration and prevents the virus from evading interferon.

In effect, natural mucosal immunity tends to stop the virus entering the blood stream.

Huge benefit there as the spike inside the body triggers autoimmunity.

Expand full comment
Mark Luersen's avatar

Not sure why for some the second covid infection was worse then the first (again, prior to vax rollout), unless the damage is cumulative? The site thailandmedicalnews outlines 400+ cellular pathway disruptions since the beginning and I am inclined to believe them (even though their tone to westerners can be nasty).

Expand full comment
this little authoritarian's avatar

There is a trend to equivocate infection between transfected and untransfected individuals. Not surprising given the majority has been transfected at least once. However, without the data from the control group, they can't make any conclusions that don't involve transfection as the driver of this.

Expand full comment
Swamp_Yankee's avatar

A study of vaccinated and unvaccinated people who have been infected need to be done and the two groups compared.

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

I think that they (FDA, CDC) already know the answers.... they just don’t want US knowing the answers.

Expand full comment
AlternativeNarrative's avatar

One of your respondents triggered a question I've been considering for awhile...

I wonder what percentage of the vaccine injured are recipients of mix-&-match vaccines? How many of the vaccine injured have had Moderna & Pfizer, or Pfizer & AZ, or Moderna & AZ, or, God forbid, one of each..?

Do you think folks who mixed & matched their vaccines are more or less likely to suffer adverse reactions? I got a bad feeling when this became an accepted position. I didn't like the feeling of taking even one barely researched, totally novel, never-tried-before, rushed-out vaccine, never mind two or even three different ones in a row. Gave me a bad feeling, that did.

Most of the people I know were quite happy, didn't bat an eyelid, just went ahead with Pfizer first then an AZ... What can I do? All you can do is lead them to the water, if they choose to spit in back in our faces, fine. We tried.

Expand full comment
Dr Philip McMillan's avatar

Brilliant question.

Not sure if it is easy to find an answer.

Expand full comment
AlternativeNarrative's avatar

It might require a survey of the vaccine injured in places where the mix-&-match protocol was accepted.

Expand full comment
Swamp_Yankee's avatar

Someone please explain to me why this would not happen with the vaccine....

Expand full comment
Henry Engelking's avatar

Dr. McMillan needed to speak cryptically in his Youtube video or the video would be taken down. Reading his Substack bullet points he is saying if you have a natural infection it will prevent recurrent infection. It is the recurrent infection that is damaging the immune system. The vaccine does not prevent recurrent infection, and may even be causing the recurrent infections--->damage to the immune system. Maybe Dr. McMillan can give this a like if I have it right.

Expand full comment
Dr Philip McMillan's avatar

Correct

Expand full comment
SL's avatar

Spike Protein System-wide Transcriptome Damage and Tissue Identity Loss

https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/spike-protein-system-wide-transcriptome?

Expand full comment
G.L.'s avatar

I‘m from germany, not vacccinated, female, 57 years old. I had the first infection with Sars Cov19 variant Omikron(?) in march 2022, the second infection im december 2022.

Both times same symtoms without any severe. Second time most milder. Actually i‘m doing well. So… what do i have to fear?

Expand full comment