I asked Bing Copilot (AI search) . Does N1-Methyl-Pseudouridine block interferon signalling? It answered,
“Yes, N1-Methyl-Pseudouridine (m1Ψ) does have an impact on interferon signalling. Research indicates that incorporating m1Ψ into mRNA can inhibit essential immunological pathways, including early interferon signaling. This modification is used in mRNA vaccines to reduce immune activation and ensure proper spike protein synthesis.
However, there's evidence suggesting that high levels of m1Ψ might impair immune responses and potentially aid cancer growth in certain models. Therefore, it's crucial to balance the modification to avoid immune suppression while maintaining vaccine efficacy”
So how covid19 Pfizer/Mod-E-RNA shots were so different than this RSV=" vaccine, an mRNA-based candidate, appeared to exacerbate RSV infections rather than mitigate them"??? Aren't they all the same 'technology'???
What Can We Do?
=>stop listening to any 'health care professional' who tries to inject anything (except for Vit C and other essential vitamins) into the human body. Enough is enough.
And the most important: FORBID production of ANY SYNTHETIC GENETIC material, unless, it is only for all the Nobel prize winners who want to test it on themself... Yes, I'm talking to you, Weissman!
The other question is why do we need an RSV vaccine to begin with. We barely understand the health consequences of RSV during childhood although it has been shown to elevate risk for other things. Above all the only reason there is continued use of mRNA technology is because it has been “accepted” by FDA…there have been attempts for RSV vaccines going back to the late 60s and 70s. There is a reason they are not commonplace. This is only going on because there is regulatory relaxation to do it…perhaps not because we need it or even that people want it? Lots of trials get swept under the rug…this case is no different. All you hear is “it failed” and that’s it.
Thank Dr Philip Mc Millan why not do a video with Dr Sabine Stebel (Biologist, Protein engineer) about the gene therapy shedding and her new first study with the machine and blood tests. IgG goes up in the presence of the injected etc.
SABINE STEBEL SHEDDING VIDEO to go with her substacks
❗️Austria: Project Scan2000❗️
it's about a very interesting topic about detecting foreign substances, spike proteins and shedding through blood tests.
Two of the initiators of the project are also on the show: Dr. Sabine Stebel & Holger Reißner We will probably support this project from around mid-January 2025.
A test device including test kits and accessories has already been ordered.
STUDY PROJECT SCAN 2000 IgG as an indicator for spikeopathy and shedding
Might I suggest that we stay away from all vaccines produced via mRNA technology? Further, that authorities—and I use that word loosely—ban such technology for conversion of current, proven vaccines to such production method. Finally, that current vaccines using mRNA technology be removed from the market pending new, and realistic safety study completion. This should be easy since they were allowed under “emergency use” authorization. There is no longer any emergency justifying their use—except the pharma companies’ bottom line.
If people had to personally pay for vaccines, would they?
Vaccines are not free. The government borrows money (they say you and your children have to pay it back). They use the borrowed money to buy vaccines from their Big Pharma friends. They then pay to distribute those jabs. They threaten you with negative consequences if you do take them. The government pays millions in propaganda advertising to push the vax and threatens media and social media companies to push the vax or be taken down / destroyed by the government. Doctors are forced to push the shots, or they lose their licenses to be a doctor, destroying their lives.
Imagine if people had to personally pay out of their own pocket for the shots. If people measured the decision to take a vaccine based on the promise of the manufacturer. Is the investment in money out of pocket worth the trade-off? People are so screwed by government policy now; they have to choose between food or housing; if they had to pay for vaccines, would they?
I appreciate your investigative work- but is there any mRNA in the covid vaccines? Or is that another lie to distract us? You can read about modRNA (modified RNA), SV40, lipid nanoparticles, nanotechnology and . . ? with the resulting sequelae of these harmful substances and no data to show long term health consequences.
I asked Bing Copilot (AI search) . Does N1-Methyl-Pseudouridine block interferon signalling? It answered,
“Yes, N1-Methyl-Pseudouridine (m1Ψ) does have an impact on interferon signalling. Research indicates that incorporating m1Ψ into mRNA can inhibit essential immunological pathways, including early interferon signaling. This modification is used in mRNA vaccines to reduce immune activation and ensure proper spike protein synthesis.
However, there's evidence suggesting that high levels of m1Ψ might impair immune responses and potentially aid cancer growth in certain models. Therefore, it's crucial to balance the modification to avoid immune suppression while maintaining vaccine efficacy”
Excellent information.
So how covid19 Pfizer/Mod-E-RNA shots were so different than this RSV=" vaccine, an mRNA-based candidate, appeared to exacerbate RSV infections rather than mitigate them"??? Aren't they all the same 'technology'???
What Can We Do?
=>stop listening to any 'health care professional' who tries to inject anything (except for Vit C and other essential vitamins) into the human body. Enough is enough.
And the most important: FORBID production of ANY SYNTHETIC GENETIC material, unless, it is only for all the Nobel prize winners who want to test it on themself... Yes, I'm talking to you, Weissman!
The other question is why do we need an RSV vaccine to begin with. We barely understand the health consequences of RSV during childhood although it has been shown to elevate risk for other things. Above all the only reason there is continued use of mRNA technology is because it has been “accepted” by FDA…there have been attempts for RSV vaccines going back to the late 60s and 70s. There is a reason they are not commonplace. This is only going on because there is regulatory relaxation to do it…perhaps not because we need it or even that people want it? Lots of trials get swept under the rug…this case is no different. All you hear is “it failed” and that’s it.
Thank Dr Philip Mc Millan why not do a video with Dr Sabine Stebel (Biologist, Protein engineer) about the gene therapy shedding and her new first study with the machine and blood tests. IgG goes up in the presence of the injected etc.
SABINE STEBEL SHEDDING VIDEO to go with her substacks
❗️Austria: Project Scan2000❗️
it's about a very interesting topic about detecting foreign substances, spike proteins and shedding through blood tests.
Two of the initiators of the project are also on the show: Dr. Sabine Stebel & Holger Reißner We will probably support this project from around mid-January 2025.
A test device including test kits and accessories has already been ordered.
STUDY PROJECT SCAN 2000 IgG as an indicator for spikeopathy and shedding
https://www.youtube.com/live/7Jo4LY8ovbg
“What can we do?”
Might I suggest that we stay away from all vaccines produced via mRNA technology? Further, that authorities—and I use that word loosely—ban such technology for conversion of current, proven vaccines to such production method. Finally, that current vaccines using mRNA technology be removed from the market pending new, and realistic safety study completion. This should be easy since they were allowed under “emergency use” authorization. There is no longer any emergency justifying their use—except the pharma companies’ bottom line.
If people had to personally pay for vaccines, would they?
Vaccines are not free. The government borrows money (they say you and your children have to pay it back). They use the borrowed money to buy vaccines from their Big Pharma friends. They then pay to distribute those jabs. They threaten you with negative consequences if you do take them. The government pays millions in propaganda advertising to push the vax and threatens media and social media companies to push the vax or be taken down / destroyed by the government. Doctors are forced to push the shots, or they lose their licenses to be a doctor, destroying their lives.
Imagine if people had to personally pay out of their own pocket for the shots. If people measured the decision to take a vaccine based on the promise of the manufacturer. Is the investment in money out of pocket worth the trade-off? People are so screwed by government policy now; they have to choose between food or housing; if they had to pay for vaccines, would they?
Look at this DNA contamination data
https://archive.md/gUgKV
I appreciate your investigative work- but is there any mRNA in the covid vaccines? Or is that another lie to distract us? You can read about modRNA (modified RNA), SV40, lipid nanoparticles, nanotechnology and . . ? with the resulting sequelae of these harmful substances and no data to show long term health consequences.
I think the other vaxs are already mARN type even before Covid era. And anestesics too.