There should not have been a mass population ‘vaccine response’ against ‘Covid-19’, a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people.

Why didn’t members of the medical and scientific establishment challenge this grossly disproportionate and ill-targeted response at the time?

See my BMJ rapid response published in March 2020:

Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The case of SARS-CoV2


Expand full comment

Hi Elizabeth, They did challenge it. Geert Van Den Bosch wrote to the W.H.O. requesting they hold a debate, as he said a vaccination should not be administered to the population during a pandemic. They did not respond.. He, along with many other doctors and scientists were censored, black-listed, and ridiculed when they dared to challenge the narrative. They were barred from many social media platforms, including YouTube, and anything they said was quickly reported by the mainstream media as misinformation. Members of the public who called up radio and tv programmes to do the same, were quickly switched off! Freedom of speech and scientific debate disappeared overnight, which rang mega alarm bells for me and for many of my friends. Mark Zuckerberg admitted in June this year that much of what Facebook fact-checkers stated was misinformation was actually true, or debatable.

Expand full comment

Rose, my BMJ rapid response was published in March 2020…

Can you please provide me with the names of “many other doctors and scientists” who dared to challenge the narrative in March 2020?

Which doctors and scientists dared to question the ‘vaccine solution’ against a disease that wasn’t a threat to most people in March 2020?

When did Geert Vanden Bossche write to the WHO?

Expand full comment

Thanks Elizabeth for the link.

Expand full comment

The biggest problem with the vaccine is making people think they are protected against coronavirus.

Expand full comment

Thank Dr. McM. As always. Fascinating & elucidating.

Expand full comment