Accumulated poisons perhaps 😁 That’s where the tumor is right your body’s attempt to control spread of poison throughout the body,, it Wraps up in a ball( tumor). The so-called turbo cancer is obviously your bodies detoxification centers being overwhelmed with an accumulation of poisonS. You Have to give the psychos credit at the world economic forum they’re quite geniuses. The multiple factors of termination via the injection are outstanding and most allopathic people will never connect the dots. Truly satanic of the highest order. 2 million dead from the shot and writing and 2 billion with a B seriously injured from it Christ have mercy
Government Reports Confirm COVID-19 Vaccination Has Caused Cancer At An Unprecedented Rate
Sept. 15, 2023
Cancer begins when genetic changes interfere with the normal replication and replacement of cells in the body. Cells start to grow uncontrollably and may form a tumour. It is the No. 2 leading cause of death in the United States.
Unfortunately, it appears the disease may be on the rise thanks to the experimental Covid-19 injections. Because official U.S. Government data confirms the risk of developing cancer following Covid-19 vaccination is 1433x greater than the background risk.
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) hosts a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) which contains historical data on adverse reactions reported against every vaccine that has been administered in the United States of America.
A quick search of the CDC VAERS database on the number of cancer cases reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections since they were first rolled out in the USA, reveals that from December 2020 up to 5th August 2022, a total of 2,579 adverse events related to cancer were made in just 1 year and 8 months.
But performing a similar search of the VAERS database on the number of cancer cases reported as adverse events to all other available vaccines between 2008 and 2020, a period of 13 years, reveals there were just 791 adverse events related to cancer.
Many would simply argue without backing their claim up with any evidence, that this is just because of the volume of Covid-19 injections administered compared to all other vaccines. But unfortunately, anyone who argues this is wrong.
We can see this by looking at the number of doses administered.
The following chart shows the total number of flu vaccine doses administered in 13 full flu seasons all the way from the 2008/2009 flu season to the 2019-2020 flu season. The data has been extracted from the CDC info found here.
In all between the 08/09 flu season and the 19/20 flu season, there were a total of 1,720,400,000 (1.7204 billion) doses of the flu jab administered in the USA.
The CDC also confirms that between 2008 and 2020, a period of 13 years, there were just 64 events related to cancer reported as adverse reactions to the influenza vaccines.
Based on the number of adverse events related to cancer alone, we can see that there have been 40.3x as many cancer cases related to Covid-19 vaccination than there have been related to flu vaccination.
But whilst shocking, this statistic doesn't properly represent the severity of the situation. To do that we need to know the number of cancer cases per 100,000 doses administered.
Based on the above numbers provided by the CDC, the number of adverse events related to cancer reported per 100,000 doses of flu vaccine administered equates to just 0.0003 per 100,000 doses.
According to `Our World in Data', as of 9th August 2022, 606 million doses of the Covid-19 vaccines have been administered in the USA. This means there have been actually nearly 3x as many flu vaccines administered between 2008-2020 than Covid-19 injections since the end of 2020, let alone all of the other vaccines that have been administered.
Therefore, the number of adverse events related to cancer reported per 100,000 doses of Covid-19 vaccine administered equates to 0.43 per 100,000 doses.
This means Covid-19 vaccination is 1433.33x / 143,233.33% more likely to cause cancer than flu vaccination. It can be argued that because the numbers are so extraordinarily low for the flu vaccine, that flu vaccination does not cause cancer. Therefore, it can be argued that the risk of developing cancer following Covid-19 vaccination is 1433x greater than the background risk.
This should however not come as much of a surprise considering we already have scientific proof that the Covid-19 mRNA injections can cause cancer of the ovaries, pancreas and breast.
The homologous recombination DNA repair pathway is one of the mechanisms that the body uses to stop your cells from turning cancerous in response to environmental stress.
And in October 2021, two revered scientists, called Jiang and Mei, had a paper published, after peer review, in MDPI, showing that the SARS-Cov-2 spike protein obliterated the DNA repair mechanism in lymphocytes.
The viral spike protein was so toxic to this pathway that it knocked 90% of it out. If the whole spike protein got into the nucleus (in the ovaries), and enough of it was produced and hung around long enough before the body was able to get rid of it all, it would cause cancer.
Fortunately, in the case of natural infection, this is unlikely to occur. But the experimental mRNA "vaccines" induce spike protein to be produced in and around the cell nucleus and this occurs for at least 60 days and almost certainly longer.
This is probably why cases of ovarian cancer are now at an all-time high.
Official UK data published by Public Health Scotland, which can be found here, reveal the number of women suffering ovarian cancer from the introduction of the Covid-19 injection to the general population. Unfortunately, the known trend in 2021 was significantly higher than 2020 and the 2017-2019 average.
The above chart shows up to June 2021, but the charts found on Public Health Scotland's dashboard now show figures all the way up to December 2021 and unfortunately reveal that the gap has widened even further with the number of women suffering from Ovarian cancer increasing significantly.
If you still wish to get a jab that doesn't stop you from getting Covid-19, doesn't stop you from spreading Covid-19, increases your risk of mortality significantly (see here), and increases your risk of suffering cancer by 143,233% then that's up to you. But perhaps you can now be a little more understanding of why many others simply refuse to do so.
Dr. McCullough Warns: Getting Jabbed Multiple Times With mRNA COVID "Vaccines" Could Promote "Turbo Cancer"
Oct. 12, 2023
During a recent online symposium organized by the World Council for Health, renowned internist and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough warned about the latest research confirming that Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) "vaccines" are, in fact, linked to a newfound phenomenon known as "turbo cancer."
Dr. McCullough unpacked a prominent theory bearing much credibility that cancer is only allowed to form inside a human body when certain "multiple different processes" are impacted, even if a "single source of exposure" is responsible for triggering these multiple different processes.
The single source of exposure that Dr. McCullough was referring to is, of course, Fauci Flu shots. Citing the "Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Carcinogenesis" proposed by Sutherland and J.C. Bailar in 1984, Dr. McCullough argued that mRNA injections in particular trigger multiple different changes throughout the body that promote cancer formation and spread.
Dr. McCullough also cited a pre-print paper asserting that the S2 segment of the spike protein produced by the mRNA covid injections "is likely to inhibit tumor suppressor systems." In his view, this cancer-promoting effect of the shots "hit number one."
(Related: Sadly, even those of us who did not get injected for COVID directly may have still been "vaccinated" indirectly by fully injected people who unknowingly "shed" the poison on us in passing.)
Were COVID "vaccines" purposely designed to trigger "turbo cancers?"
Research out of China also shows that the mRNA component of the injections "impair[s] the natural DNA repair mechanisms of the human body." This would qualify as another of the multiple different processes through which COVID shots cause cancer to form and spread.
In other words, the S2 component of the shots inhibits tumor suppression while the mRNA component stops the body from repairing corrupted DNA, the latter of which Dr. McCullough described as "hit number two."
A potential third source of cancer promotion from COVID shots is the apparent "contamination" of the vials with Simian Virus 40, or SV40. This and other contaminants act as "promoters and enhancers" of cancer, as well as other poisons like E. coli.
The purported reason why E. coli is even used at all is to help Big Pharma mass produce "large quantities of messenger RNA," Dr. McCullough further explained.
As for SV40, another paper published in the journal Clinical Microbiology Reviews explains that the toxin is a "known oncogenic DNA virus which induces primary brain and bone cancers, malignant mesothelioma and lymphomas in laboratory animals."
The overall purpose of the symposium at which Dr. McCullough spoke was to address the implications of the recently discovered plasmid DNA in COVID jabs. As retired Thai-German microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi warned, plasmid DNA causes genetic mutations that once again are linked to cancer formation.
Plasmid DNA is also toxic simply because it is a foreign type of DNA that the body does not recognize, which thus causes it to attack itself with auto-immunity. Dr. Bhakdi warns that this plasmid DNA leads to "long-term inflammation and organ damage throughout the body."
"We knew this was coming," one of our own commenters wrote, explaining what he or she is doing to combat the issue of COVID jab shedding. "The government and media tried to denounce as something conspiracy theorists do, research. Since the start of the jab nonsense, I have been foraging dandelions and pine and growing artemisia (the prime herb used in ivermectin).
"We have been drinking pine needle tea daily for a few years now. This has been shown to help prevent the spikes from binding to your T-cell receptors via the shikimic acid, d-limonene, quercetin, vitamin C and antioxidants that pine contains. We double up or sometimes triple up if we've been around shedders."
With respect to cancer treatments such as chemo, radiation etc. I must say I have lost trust. Do they work? Is there hard data that it cures people? Or do they diminish quality of life and people die anyway? I saw some older films about treatments which seemed to be banned whilst they seemed to work (one was about amygdalin the substance in peach kernels I believe, which only Mexico allows) but also other treatments. Since covid, I have totally list faith in modern medicine.
I work in a pharmaceutical plant,( a sexy name for "chemical plant") and over the years of handling toxic/corrosive/carcinogenic materials, I have come up with the conclusion that the whole allopathic medicine regime is the biggest grift in history.
As for chemo?
I honestly do not know anyone who has gone through chemo that was cured of their cancer. All it did was shit on their immune system.
Does not cost even $1 to apply our own urine and to put a teaspoon of urine into the mouth. Yet, no one wants to try this very effective method, for FREE. Urine has saved many lives. It is ancient. Animals instinctively lick their urine when they are injured or ill. Babies are floating in a tub of their own urine during the pregnancy...babies excrete urine too...where does that urine go?
Macrophage activation most likely is not the primary mechanism of cancer increase during and after the pandemic. But the elephant in the room could be, when you consider the mechanism through a prism of autoimmunity that is an opposite side of the cancer coin as it was elegantly laid out in https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffimmu.2022.793234. That is, immune tolerance against self-antigen and auto-immunity against self-protein are governed by the same mechanisms.
However, this will be even harder to discuss about this topic after the self-antigen tolerizing technology was recently prised as the greatest achievement in medicine, namely, Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA.
Primary autoimmune.Feb 22 dedicated spine consistent with Cauda Equina. Oct 23 bowel you or with Nedra’s to liver. Asked a Gus’s how long it’s been there ?? Approx 5:7 months . Huge attack on my liver. I dont smoke or drink
I recall a July 2020 public reference by Prof. Nevan Krogan of University of California, San Francisco on repurposing existing cancer drugs for Covid-19. He had suggested how CV and Cancer hijack the same cellular pathways - kinases, the cellular switches - to proliferate. If I had understood it correctly, he had studied some 97 well known kinases, 87 cancer drugs that can change the kinase controlled pathways and 68 were effective in cell studies, preventing the viral growth mechanisms. These included molecules like Silmitasertib, Giliteritinib, Ralmetinib, Aplimod, Diacinilib etc. I do not know if he studied subsequently the reverse possibility that m-RNA vaccine spike remnants too exhibited such malignant mechanisms - the vaccine was supposed to prevent one from the after ill effects of the virus. Most of the cancer drugs ( non biological types) too share the amine nitrogen structure feature with the more common anti histamines, anti inflammatories, immune modulators, some anti infectives and a whole host of others. A point that is not to be missed, as I had said often as an organic chemist. As it happened, there was no need to introduce cancer drugs for the Covid portfolio, as the more common categories mentioned above took care of the virus effectively.
Urine can arrest any cancer. It does not matter the cause, urine works to invigorate the immune system.. T-cells, B-Cells, Natural Killer Cells, Macrophages, enzymes, etc. The cellular system is complex, yet fragile. Covid jabs contains ingredients that suppresses the immune system, triggers the inflammatory responses and causes much distress to the body. Urine works swiftly to calm things down, to re-start the immune system and later, to generate new cells to replace the billions of cells that will be destroyed and removed from the body.
Yes, how to take urine ? Is there any key publication that urine components have anti cancer properties ? Is it simple Urea itself or the various waste proteins in it or any metabolic chemicals or the many viruses/bacteria present in it ? That is the way to prove and establish the therapeutic potential, not direct use. It can never be promoted in any culture as direct use. . Any international institutes interested in this research ? The classic BCG vaccine was seriously suggested in the early pandemic as a provider of general immune cells against this virus. Of course the promise was quickly scuttled instead of being explored seriously. Would the same premise hold for its use in cancer therapy in some early stage or in post vaccine recurrence cases ?
You meant, Covid VACCINE Cancer Explosion!
Accumulated poisons perhaps 😁 That’s where the tumor is right your body’s attempt to control spread of poison throughout the body,, it Wraps up in a ball( tumor). The so-called turbo cancer is obviously your bodies detoxification centers being overwhelmed with an accumulation of poisonS. You Have to give the psychos credit at the world economic forum they’re quite geniuses. The multiple factors of termination via the injection are outstanding and most allopathic people will never connect the dots. Truly satanic of the highest order. 2 million dead from the shot and writing and 2 billion with a B seriously injured from it Christ have mercy
Cancer, truly a disease of civilization or de Civilization
Government Reports Confirm COVID-19 Vaccination Has Caused Cancer At An Unprecedented Rate
Sept. 15, 2023
Cancer begins when genetic changes interfere with the normal replication and replacement of cells in the body. Cells start to grow uncontrollably and may form a tumour. It is the No. 2 leading cause of death in the United States.
Unfortunately, it appears the disease may be on the rise thanks to the experimental Covid-19 injections. Because official U.S. Government data confirms the risk of developing cancer following Covid-19 vaccination is 1433x greater than the background risk.
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) hosts a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) which contains historical data on adverse reactions reported against every vaccine that has been administered in the United States of America.
A quick search of the CDC VAERS database on the number of cancer cases reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections since they were first rolled out in the USA, reveals that from December 2020 up to 5th August 2022, a total of 2,579 adverse events related to cancer were made in just 1 year and 8 months.
But performing a similar search of the VAERS database on the number of cancer cases reported as adverse events to all other available vaccines between 2008 and 2020, a period of 13 years, reveals there were just 791 adverse events related to cancer.
Many would simply argue without backing their claim up with any evidence, that this is just because of the volume of Covid-19 injections administered compared to all other vaccines. But unfortunately, anyone who argues this is wrong.
We can see this by looking at the number of doses administered.
The following chart shows the total number of flu vaccine doses administered in 13 full flu seasons all the way from the 2008/2009 flu season to the 2019-2020 flu season. The data has been extracted from the CDC info found here.
In all between the 08/09 flu season and the 19/20 flu season, there were a total of 1,720,400,000 (1.7204 billion) doses of the flu jab administered in the USA.
The CDC also confirms that between 2008 and 2020, a period of 13 years, there were just 64 events related to cancer reported as adverse reactions to the influenza vaccines.
Based on the number of adverse events related to cancer alone, we can see that there have been 40.3x as many cancer cases related to Covid-19 vaccination than there have been related to flu vaccination.
But whilst shocking, this statistic doesn't properly represent the severity of the situation. To do that we need to know the number of cancer cases per 100,000 doses administered.
Based on the above numbers provided by the CDC, the number of adverse events related to cancer reported per 100,000 doses of flu vaccine administered equates to just 0.0003 per 100,000 doses.
According to `Our World in Data', as of 9th August 2022, 606 million doses of the Covid-19 vaccines have been administered in the USA. This means there have been actually nearly 3x as many flu vaccines administered between 2008-2020 than Covid-19 injections since the end of 2020, let alone all of the other vaccines that have been administered.
Therefore, the number of adverse events related to cancer reported per 100,000 doses of Covid-19 vaccine administered equates to 0.43 per 100,000 doses.
This means Covid-19 vaccination is 1433.33x / 143,233.33% more likely to cause cancer than flu vaccination. It can be argued that because the numbers are so extraordinarily low for the flu vaccine, that flu vaccination does not cause cancer. Therefore, it can be argued that the risk of developing cancer following Covid-19 vaccination is 1433x greater than the background risk.
This should however not come as much of a surprise considering we already have scientific proof that the Covid-19 mRNA injections can cause cancer of the ovaries, pancreas and breast.
The homologous recombination DNA repair pathway is one of the mechanisms that the body uses to stop your cells from turning cancerous in response to environmental stress.
And in October 2021, two revered scientists, called Jiang and Mei, had a paper published, after peer review, in MDPI, showing that the SARS-Cov-2 spike protein obliterated the DNA repair mechanism in lymphocytes.
The viral spike protein was so toxic to this pathway that it knocked 90% of it out. If the whole spike protein got into the nucleus (in the ovaries), and enough of it was produced and hung around long enough before the body was able to get rid of it all, it would cause cancer.
Fortunately, in the case of natural infection, this is unlikely to occur. But the experimental mRNA "vaccines" induce spike protein to be produced in and around the cell nucleus and this occurs for at least 60 days and almost certainly longer.
This is probably why cases of ovarian cancer are now at an all-time high.
Official UK data published by Public Health Scotland, which can be found here, reveal the number of women suffering ovarian cancer from the introduction of the Covid-19 injection to the general population. Unfortunately, the known trend in 2021 was significantly higher than 2020 and the 2017-2019 average.
The above chart shows up to June 2021, but the charts found on Public Health Scotland's dashboard now show figures all the way up to December 2021 and unfortunately reveal that the gap has widened even further with the number of women suffering from Ovarian cancer increasing significantly.
If you still wish to get a jab that doesn't stop you from getting Covid-19, doesn't stop you from spreading Covid-19, increases your risk of mortality significantly (see here), and increases your risk of suffering cancer by 143,233% then that's up to you. But perhaps you can now be a little more understanding of why many others simply refuse to do so.
https://expose-news.com/2023/09/15/covid-jabs-cause-cancer-unprecedented-rate/
Dr. McCullough Warns: Getting Jabbed Multiple Times With mRNA COVID "Vaccines" Could Promote "Turbo Cancer"
Oct. 12, 2023
During a recent online symposium organized by the World Council for Health, renowned internist and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough warned about the latest research confirming that Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) "vaccines" are, in fact, linked to a newfound phenomenon known as "turbo cancer."
Dr. McCullough unpacked a prominent theory bearing much credibility that cancer is only allowed to form inside a human body when certain "multiple different processes" are impacted, even if a "single source of exposure" is responsible for triggering these multiple different processes.
The single source of exposure that Dr. McCullough was referring to is, of course, Fauci Flu shots. Citing the "Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Carcinogenesis" proposed by Sutherland and J.C. Bailar in 1984, Dr. McCullough argued that mRNA injections in particular trigger multiple different changes throughout the body that promote cancer formation and spread.
Dr. McCullough also cited a pre-print paper asserting that the S2 segment of the spike protein produced by the mRNA covid injections "is likely to inhibit tumor suppressor systems." In his view, this cancer-promoting effect of the shots "hit number one."
(Related: Sadly, even those of us who did not get injected for COVID directly may have still been "vaccinated" indirectly by fully injected people who unknowingly "shed" the poison on us in passing.)
Were COVID "vaccines" purposely designed to trigger "turbo cancers?"
Research out of China also shows that the mRNA component of the injections "impair[s] the natural DNA repair mechanisms of the human body." This would qualify as another of the multiple different processes through which COVID shots cause cancer to form and spread.
In other words, the S2 component of the shots inhibits tumor suppression while the mRNA component stops the body from repairing corrupted DNA, the latter of which Dr. McCullough described as "hit number two."
A potential third source of cancer promotion from COVID shots is the apparent "contamination" of the vials with Simian Virus 40, or SV40. This and other contaminants act as "promoters and enhancers" of cancer, as well as other poisons like E. coli.
The purported reason why E. coli is even used at all is to help Big Pharma mass produce "large quantities of messenger RNA," Dr. McCullough further explained.
As for SV40, another paper published in the journal Clinical Microbiology Reviews explains that the toxin is a "known oncogenic DNA virus which induces primary brain and bone cancers, malignant mesothelioma and lymphomas in laboratory animals."
The overall purpose of the symposium at which Dr. McCullough spoke was to address the implications of the recently discovered plasmid DNA in COVID jabs. As retired Thai-German microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi warned, plasmid DNA causes genetic mutations that once again are linked to cancer formation.
Plasmid DNA is also toxic simply because it is a foreign type of DNA that the body does not recognize, which thus causes it to attack itself with auto-immunity. Dr. Bhakdi warns that this plasmid DNA leads to "long-term inflammation and organ damage throughout the body."
"We knew this was coming," one of our own commenters wrote, explaining what he or she is doing to combat the issue of COVID jab shedding. "The government and media tried to denounce as something conspiracy theorists do, research. Since the start of the jab nonsense, I have been foraging dandelions and pine and growing artemisia (the prime herb used in ivermectin).
"We have been drinking pine needle tea daily for a few years now. This has been shown to help prevent the spikes from binding to your T-cell receptors via the shikimic acid, d-limonene, quercetin, vitamin C and antioxidants that pine contains. We double up or sometimes triple up if we've been around shedders."
https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-10-12-mccullough-jabbed-mrna-covid-vaccines-turbo-cancer.html
With respect to cancer treatments such as chemo, radiation etc. I must say I have lost trust. Do they work? Is there hard data that it cures people? Or do they diminish quality of life and people die anyway? I saw some older films about treatments which seemed to be banned whilst they seemed to work (one was about amygdalin the substance in peach kernels I believe, which only Mexico allows) but also other treatments. Since covid, I have totally list faith in modern medicine.
Careful to not throw out the baby with the bath water
That makes two of us.
I work in a pharmaceutical plant,( a sexy name for "chemical plant") and over the years of handling toxic/corrosive/carcinogenic materials, I have come up with the conclusion that the whole allopathic medicine regime is the biggest grift in history.
As for chemo?
I honestly do not know anyone who has gone through chemo that was cured of their cancer. All it did was shit on their immune system.
Depends on the cancer.
However chemo is an awful strain on the body.
So pleased you are on substack! I cannot find your latest videos on youtube, I see only older ones when I go to your YT channel.
Thank you.
Will look into my YouTube listings.
Does not cost even $1 to apply our own urine and to put a teaspoon of urine into the mouth. Yet, no one wants to try this very effective method, for FREE. Urine has saved many lives. It is ancient. Animals instinctively lick their urine when they are injured or ill. Babies are floating in a tub of their own urine during the pregnancy...babies excrete urine too...where does that urine go?
Interesting.
Macrophage activation most likely is not the primary mechanism of cancer increase during and after the pandemic. But the elephant in the room could be, when you consider the mechanism through a prism of autoimmunity that is an opposite side of the cancer coin as it was elegantly laid out in https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffimmu.2022.793234. That is, immune tolerance against self-antigen and auto-immunity against self-protein are governed by the same mechanisms.
However, this will be even harder to discuss about this topic after the self-antigen tolerizing technology was recently prised as the greatest achievement in medicine, namely, Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA.
Thank you for the input Janis.
Primary autoimmune.Feb 22 dedicated spine consistent with Cauda Equina. Oct 23 bowel you or with Nedra’s to liver. Asked a Gus’s how long it’s been there ?? Approx 5:7 months . Huge attack on my liver. I dont smoke or drink
Sorry to hear.
I recall a July 2020 public reference by Prof. Nevan Krogan of University of California, San Francisco on repurposing existing cancer drugs for Covid-19. He had suggested how CV and Cancer hijack the same cellular pathways - kinases, the cellular switches - to proliferate. If I had understood it correctly, he had studied some 97 well known kinases, 87 cancer drugs that can change the kinase controlled pathways and 68 were effective in cell studies, preventing the viral growth mechanisms. These included molecules like Silmitasertib, Giliteritinib, Ralmetinib, Aplimod, Diacinilib etc. I do not know if he studied subsequently the reverse possibility that m-RNA vaccine spike remnants too exhibited such malignant mechanisms - the vaccine was supposed to prevent one from the after ill effects of the virus. Most of the cancer drugs ( non biological types) too share the amine nitrogen structure feature with the more common anti histamines, anti inflammatories, immune modulators, some anti infectives and a whole host of others. A point that is not to be missed, as I had said often as an organic chemist. As it happened, there was no need to introduce cancer drugs for the Covid portfolio, as the more common categories mentioned above took care of the virus effectively.
Please read my first words as publication reference of Prof Nevan Krogan.
Urine can arrest any cancer. It does not matter the cause, urine works to invigorate the immune system.. T-cells, B-Cells, Natural Killer Cells, Macrophages, enzymes, etc. The cellular system is complex, yet fragile. Covid jabs contains ingredients that suppresses the immune system, triggers the inflammatory responses and causes much distress to the body. Urine works swiftly to calm things down, to re-start the immune system and later, to generate new cells to replace the billions of cells that will be destroyed and removed from the body.
Yes, how to take urine ? Is there any key publication that urine components have anti cancer properties ? Is it simple Urea itself or the various waste proteins in it or any metabolic chemicals or the many viruses/bacteria present in it ? That is the way to prove and establish the therapeutic potential, not direct use. It can never be promoted in any culture as direct use. . Any international institutes interested in this research ? The classic BCG vaccine was seriously suggested in the early pandemic as a provider of general immune cells against this virus. Of course the promise was quickly scuttled instead of being explored seriously. Would the same premise hold for its use in cancer therapy in some early stage or in post vaccine recurrence cases ?
How to take the urine?
Thank you for sharing.