Thanks Dr. Phillip. And you did not mention, and maybe aren’t aware, that others have done some analysis and found that people were dropped from the cohort that had negative events, some disappearing entirely as if they were never in the study.
Additionally, destroying the placebo control group illuminates the ability to go back and do further analysis at a later point in time. Seems quite nefarious.
Mikolaj Raszek performed a video discussion on the same study about 2 weeks ago, He published it on his patreon - as he knew he would be censored on YT. It‘s a shame. What would happen, if the scientific world should get access to the raw data of the trial? I can‘t imagine the outrage this would create. Hopefully one day in the near future this will happen.
If millions and billions of people worldwide were given a different vaccine than what was in the trials, whats the point of focusing on the trials? The important data on deaths and injuries comes from the actual injection that was mass produced. Not the watered down version they used in the trials. The trials accomplished what they intended. And that was only to get EUA approval. The trial data is totally unreliable and untrustworthy. And a distraction from where the real focus should be.
True, but if the trial data is falsified and shows safety issues then the real world data will be far worse. The trial data is a starting point to prove fraud.
Correct, the real world data will be far worse! Thats why I think more emphasis now should be placed on everything that is being revealed about the actual product that was injected into the masses. True the trial data is a starting point to prove fraud. But as far as Im concerned, the falsification and safety issues found during the trials was already sufficiently established and exposed. The problem was, that exposure still did not stop the injection from being mass produced and administered to millions.
BTW how was the efficacy of the vaccine measured? And what made vaxed individuals symptoms less severe than the symptoms of unvaxed individuals? The way I recall it, during the pandemic both vaxed and unvaxed individuals both shared the varied levels of symptoms throughout the pandemic. Including death. Ive have seen and heard stories of vaxed individuals who had very severe symptoms. And I have also heard stories of unvaxed individuals with minor symptoms. So how do we even know if the vaccine was providing protection/efficacy? And not just believing what we were told by people that were lying about the ability of the vaccine.
Working in A&E seeing our daily attendance numbers plummet from 375 per day to 150 per day for many months in 2020 I knew there would be a pile of bodies somewhere down the line. With people clapping like circus seals at their doorsteps it was clear manipulation was in play. I never took these poisons and I resent every single one of my colleagues who promoted or administered it. I have been a registered nurse 30 years, I can’t do the job any longer and will be removing myself from the register in the next few weeks once I have worked my notice period. In all good conscience, I can’t participate in this sordid business any longer.
Are we sure the placebo was saline? That would be quite unusual for an 'enthusiastic' drug manufacturer. If these trial subjects were 'healthy' that's still quite a few dying in middle age of heart-related issues and other diseases, albeit many fewer than in the vaccine group.
I saw Hotek defending using adjuvants as the placebo, not saline. Apparently that’s common practice when testing new vaccines. I thought that’s what they did with mRNA but the article indicated saline. Best case is to have 3 groups: saline, adjuvant/medium only, and full product. Then if it turns out aluminum is a primary problem they can change the adjuvants.
The convenient change in the indication for the vaccination across the population from one preventing the infection and transmission to one that reduced the severity of disease in itself reveals the flawed design of the trial. The safety measure in the targeted aged (and vulnerable) population cannot be extrapolated to the younger population unless the safety was analysed among age matched cohorts. The real evidence of safety or incidence of cardiovascular events and other chronic disabling illnesses will emerge only when measured in the younger (and non vulnerable population). Further the beneficial immune response in the host foreseen with conventional vaccines ( or the infection iteself) is one that does not bypass the regulating T lymphocytes ( bringing about the balance and priming of the immune system). Whereas this natural process is hacked and bypassed by the mRNA mediated immunogen, therefore resulting in chronic uncontrolled proinflammatory response (autoimmunity) in any target organs the mRNA gets transported from the site of injection.
I'm not sure where I read this, but the number of deaths of both arms of trial combinded is only a fraction of what would be expected from normal death rates. There were a large number of people who could not be contacted and might have died.
Thanks Dr. Phillip. And you did not mention, and maybe aren’t aware, that others have done some analysis and found that people were dropped from the cohort that had negative events, some disappearing entirely as if they were never in the study.
Additionally, destroying the placebo control group illuminates the ability to go back and do further analysis at a later point in time. Seems quite nefarious.
Absolutely correct.
Imagine if they were included as well.
Thank you for all the work and diligent analysis of the COVID pharma malfeasance.
Appreciated.
Mikolaj Raszek performed a video discussion on the same study about 2 weeks ago, He published it on his patreon - as he knew he would be censored on YT. It‘s a shame. What would happen, if the scientific world should get access to the raw data of the trial? I can‘t imagine the outrage this would create. Hopefully one day in the near future this will happen.
Very true, thank you.
Please post videos on Rumble. They don't censor the way YouTube does.
Thank you.
If millions and billions of people worldwide were given a different vaccine than what was in the trials, whats the point of focusing on the trials? The important data on deaths and injuries comes from the actual injection that was mass produced. Not the watered down version they used in the trials. The trials accomplished what they intended. And that was only to get EUA approval. The trial data is totally unreliable and untrustworthy. And a distraction from where the real focus should be.
True, but if the trial data is falsified and shows safety issues then the real world data will be far worse. The trial data is a starting point to prove fraud.
Correct, the real world data will be far worse! Thats why I think more emphasis now should be placed on everything that is being revealed about the actual product that was injected into the masses. True the trial data is a starting point to prove fraud. But as far as Im concerned, the falsification and safety issues found during the trials was already sufficiently established and exposed. The problem was, that exposure still did not stop the injection from being mass produced and administered to millions.
BTW how was the efficacy of the vaccine measured? And what made vaxed individuals symptoms less severe than the symptoms of unvaxed individuals? The way I recall it, during the pandemic both vaxed and unvaxed individuals both shared the varied levels of symptoms throughout the pandemic. Including death. Ive have seen and heard stories of vaxed individuals who had very severe symptoms. And I have also heard stories of unvaxed individuals with minor symptoms. So how do we even know if the vaccine was providing protection/efficacy? And not just believing what we were told by people that were lying about the ability of the vaccine.
Working in A&E seeing our daily attendance numbers plummet from 375 per day to 150 per day for many months in 2020 I knew there would be a pile of bodies somewhere down the line. With people clapping like circus seals at their doorsteps it was clear manipulation was in play. I never took these poisons and I resent every single one of my colleagues who promoted or administered it. I have been a registered nurse 30 years, I can’t do the job any longer and will be removing myself from the register in the next few weeks once I have worked my notice period. In all good conscience, I can’t participate in this sordid business any longer.
Are we sure the placebo was saline? That would be quite unusual for an 'enthusiastic' drug manufacturer. If these trial subjects were 'healthy' that's still quite a few dying in middle age of heart-related issues and other diseases, albeit many fewer than in the vaccine group.
Just wondering
These are just normal deaths in day to day living.
The refutation of Sally Burns' point may be in the apparent efficacy of the vaccine among vaccinated group as compared to the placebo group.
The placebo cohort seems to have been given placebos.
Hat Tip to Sally Burns for coming up with an idea that would have Never occurred to me.
I saw Hotek defending using adjuvants as the placebo, not saline. Apparently that’s common practice when testing new vaccines. I thought that’s what they did with mRNA but the article indicated saline. Best case is to have 3 groups: saline, adjuvant/medium only, and full product. Then if it turns out aluminum is a primary problem they can change the adjuvants.
The convenient change in the indication for the vaccination across the population from one preventing the infection and transmission to one that reduced the severity of disease in itself reveals the flawed design of the trial. The safety measure in the targeted aged (and vulnerable) population cannot be extrapolated to the younger population unless the safety was analysed among age matched cohorts. The real evidence of safety or incidence of cardiovascular events and other chronic disabling illnesses will emerge only when measured in the younger (and non vulnerable population). Further the beneficial immune response in the host foreseen with conventional vaccines ( or the infection iteself) is one that does not bypass the regulating T lymphocytes ( bringing about the balance and priming of the immune system). Whereas this natural process is hacked and bypassed by the mRNA mediated immunogen, therefore resulting in chronic uncontrolled proinflammatory response (autoimmunity) in any target organs the mRNA gets transported from the site of injection.
I'm not sure where I read this, but the number of deaths of both arms of trial combinded is only a fraction of what would be expected from normal death rates. There were a large number of people who could not be contacted and might have died.
It was picked up by the trial review and it seems many participants dropped out.
Not clear.
Open question: How would the presence of SV40 react in people with post-polio (PPS)?
https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/european-regulator-confirms-pfizer-did-not-highlight-dna-sequence-in-covid-19-vaccine-5519668?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=TheChiefNerd&src_src=partner&src_cmp=TheChiefNerd