Focal Points (Nicolas Hulscher) ran a similar article a few days ago. Pfizer Halts COVID Shot trial because they can’t find enough Test Subjects willing to take another booster shot…it cites a Rasmussen survey found that 56% of Americans believe the COVID -19 vaccines have caused a large number of deaths. You are correct Dr McMillian they will just roll out the shots without any safety studies. Thank you for your courage, moral compass and the work you are doing!
Not just hilarious Nigel, but once AGAIN McMillan (and others commenting) draws conclusions not based on reality NOR the reasons for the enrolment failure, the most egregious of which is the one stating that the level of co-morbidities in the 50-64 yo cohort is much higher than pre-pandemic AND implies it is COVID vaccine-related!
The easiest route for these trials is in fact an adjustment to the target group - to that CLEARLY demonstrated by the effort so far as to being a higher risk group - and ALSO one willing to continue their protection from serious illness and death - outcomes STILL occurring across USA (and elsewhere), at HIGHER RATES in those NOT up to date with boosters. 🤷🏻♀️
You do realise that the groups in question, when applying to be subjects in the trials, were found to have at least one, and many had two co-morbidities which increase their risks from a SARS COV 2 infection? That is the group which MAY benefit from the protection of a modified booster, testing of which was the aim of both trials, and the protocols COULD be modified to that end. Is any of that so difficult to understand?
Instead of looking for healthy individuals to include in the trail - we should accept those with co-morbitidities (one or two). Under the assumption - that because they have co-morbitidities they have more to gain from taking the booster. That would be the hypotehsis that the trial should test? When the original Reuters article talked about 80% of people not being fit for trial - we should just adjust the experiment? The trial would be: What effect will boosters have on those with co-morbidities.
Tragically I've seen the same, and worse, conditions develop since 2021 among previously healthy COVID injected family members and friends. No unusual changes that I'm aware of in those who I know weren't injected however, myself included.
Definitely a signal on the state of poor US health but here's an important point. That unhealthy population is the target audience. Shouldn't trials be populated by people of the target population? Big Pharma would love to have only healthy participants to get approval.
They will still be giving out jabs, of course. They just won't be able to advertise specifically to that segment. If I am understanding this correctly. also, what unjabbed person in their right mind would volunteer for any mRNA jab test? There seems to not even be a captured audience - too old for military duty, except for career officers, and too young for rest homes. I assume the shots will go out as usual, with no liability, of course. Be interesting to see a real record of what all those who failed the screening were like ten years ago.
This suggests to me that a retrospective study of vaccinated versus unvaccinated individuals, matched by health status prior to vaccination. What insights could we obtain? How might the results affect strategy going forward?
Government has this information. And they’ve shared it with their supplier, Big Pharma. From the public they want to hide it, so we have to look further afield to the Italian and Japanese studies which reveal the truth.
Thank you Doctor McMillan, on two counts, for I've been feeling bereft with all current trace of you having disappeared from You Tube. Hope it wasn't as a result of some of the comments we tend to write. The sheer injustice of what has happened can make one quite vehement.
Instincts tell me, however, you came threateningly close to an appalling secret they are desperate to hide; lipid nano particles binding to proteins, causing catastrophic outcomes for many of the vaccinated.
I bet, with all this going on, you've not found time to read that short story I sent. A few words of recommendation from you........., The thing would hit like an Exocet!
Hope this reaches you, for all other attempts have failed.
hi john, been here 4 months on substack due to YTube suppression, check out my stack - i walked around in circles for 3 months until i bumped into Leo Vroman. it is his 111th birthday today!
My son in law, healthy young Professor, non-smoker who eats, sleeps and exercises well suddenly started chemo in Feb and was operated on two weeks ago having half a lung removed ( I begged my daughter not to get vxd and she didn't but he had all three and kept trying to force her. They sent him home last week but he's just gone back into the Intensive Care Unit.
This morning, I looked at my old school group (now in our 60/70s) and one has just died of aggressive cancer....got the surprise news last night.
Thanks Phillip- this is kinda funny in one sense. A public that, in the round, has become so sick that they can’t find enough ppl to take part in the trial. Maybe this is how we kill off the poisoning vaccine industry, by sickening ourselves to such an extent that only the humanised mice remain to trial these things on.
my question is . very good one . so you're vaccinated does that disqualified you from insurance . already have a condition. we don't cover . vaccinated people are a greater risk . wondering when health insurance determines this vaccinated people have a existing conditions we don't cover .
Dr. McMillan— thank you for reporting. Sadly this news does not surprise me in the least. It matches what I see in my personal circles.
Appreciated
Focal Points (Nicolas Hulscher) ran a similar article a few days ago. Pfizer Halts COVID Shot trial because they can’t find enough Test Subjects willing to take another booster shot…it cites a Rasmussen survey found that 56% of Americans believe the COVID -19 vaccines have caused a large number of deaths. You are correct Dr McMillian they will just roll out the shots without any safety studies. Thank you for your courage, moral compass and the work you are doing!
You're both hilarious
Not just hilarious Nigel, but once AGAIN McMillan (and others commenting) draws conclusions not based on reality NOR the reasons for the enrolment failure, the most egregious of which is the one stating that the level of co-morbidities in the 50-64 yo cohort is much higher than pre-pandemic AND implies it is COVID vaccine-related!
The easiest route for these trials is in fact an adjustment to the target group - to that CLEARLY demonstrated by the effort so far as to being a higher risk group - and ALSO one willing to continue their protection from serious illness and death - outcomes STILL occurring across USA (and elsewhere), at HIGHER RATES in those NOT up to date with boosters. 🤷🏻♀️
"to that CLEARLY demonstrated by the effort so far as to being a higher risk group "
Do you have a study to support this?
You do realise that the groups in question, when applying to be subjects in the trials, were found to have at least one, and many had two co-morbidities which increase their risks from a SARS COV 2 infection? That is the group which MAY benefit from the protection of a modified booster, testing of which was the aim of both trials, and the protocols COULD be modified to that end. Is any of that so difficult to understand?
Instead of looking for healthy individuals to include in the trail - we should accept those with co-morbitidities (one or two). Under the assumption - that because they have co-morbitidities they have more to gain from taking the booster. That would be the hypotehsis that the trial should test? When the original Reuters article talked about 80% of people not being fit for trial - we should just adjust the experiment? The trial would be: What effect will boosters have on those with co-morbidities.
Make sure you take your shots!
Tragically I've seen the same, and worse, conditions develop since 2021 among previously healthy COVID injected family members and friends. No unusual changes that I'm aware of in those who I know weren't injected however, myself included.
It will take a long time for this to be acknowledged.
if ever.....I suspect no one will ever admit they made a mistake
Definitely a signal on the state of poor US health but here's an important point. That unhealthy population is the target audience. Shouldn't trials be populated by people of the target population? Big Pharma would love to have only healthy participants to get approval.
They will still be giving out jabs, of course. They just won't be able to advertise specifically to that segment. If I am understanding this correctly. also, what unjabbed person in their right mind would volunteer for any mRNA jab test? There seems to not even be a captured audience - too old for military duty, except for career officers, and too young for rest homes. I assume the shots will go out as usual, with no liability, of course. Be interesting to see a real record of what all those who failed the screening were like ten years ago.
This suggests to me that a retrospective study of vaccinated versus unvaccinated individuals, matched by health status prior to vaccination. What insights could we obtain? How might the results affect strategy going forward?
Government has this information. And they’ve shared it with their supplier, Big Pharma. From the public they want to hide it, so we have to look further afield to the Italian and Japanese studies which reveal the truth.
Correct. It needs to be genuinely looking to understand the current patterns of disease.
Thank you Doctor McMillan, on two counts, for I've been feeling bereft with all current trace of you having disappeared from You Tube. Hope it wasn't as a result of some of the comments we tend to write. The sheer injustice of what has happened can make one quite vehement.
Instincts tell me, however, you came threateningly close to an appalling secret they are desperate to hide; lipid nano particles binding to proteins, causing catastrophic outcomes for many of the vaccinated.
I bet, with all this going on, you've not found time to read that short story I sent. A few words of recommendation from you........., The thing would hit like an Exocet!
Hope this reaches you, for all other attempts have failed.
Very best wishes, John Clegg
I now feel you are like a friend. So dare I ask, "Are the fat-controllers no-platforming us?
Safe question, for no AI bots would understand that!
hi john, been here 4 months on substack due to YTube suppression, check out my stack - i walked around in circles for 3 months until i bumped into Leo Vroman. it is his 111th birthday today!
https://badprotein.substack.com/p/the-vroman-effect-and-the-white-clots
https://badprotein.substack.com/p/reinforcements-weve-been-waiting
https://badprotein.substack.com/p/reinforcements-advanced-materials
https://badprotein.substack.com/p/how-lnps-can-break-blood-cells
Its going to get worse. Dr. McMillan will be prove right again.
Does anyone believe anything that comes out of big pharmacy mouth? Safe and effective??
New Cicada Variant Emerges: Experts Recommend Screaming For 17 Years
Just In Case
Dr McMillan
Please do a study on 'turbo' lung cancer.
My son in law, healthy young Professor, non-smoker who eats, sleeps and exercises well suddenly started chemo in Feb and was operated on two weeks ago having half a lung removed ( I begged my daughter not to get vxd and she didn't but he had all three and kept trying to force her. They sent him home last week but he's just gone back into the Intensive Care Unit.
This morning, I looked at my old school group (now in our 60/70s) and one has just died of aggressive cancer....got the surprise news last night.
Thanks Phillip- this is kinda funny in one sense. A public that, in the round, has become so sick that they can’t find enough ppl to take part in the trial. Maybe this is how we kill off the poisoning vaccine industry, by sickening ourselves to such an extent that only the humanised mice remain to trial these things on.
I believe this is the background proportion of adults in this age range with 1+ of those diseases. According to NHANES it’s over 75%.
my question is . very good one . so you're vaccinated does that disqualified you from insurance . already have a condition. we don't cover . vaccinated people are a greater risk . wondering when health insurance determines this vaccinated people have a existing conditions we don't cover .
With nutrient density down 85% this does not surprise me at the least. I personally thought it might have been 85-90%.