There was no medical emergency vis-à-vis COVID-19. This virus was treatable with cheap repurposed drugs (hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin). There was never any need for the mRNA inoculations.
The severity of the coronavirus was greatly exaggerated. There was never any need for the COVID-19 lockdowns and other restrictions.
But there were some excess deaths in neighbouring UK around April 2020 while NG163 from NICE was in force (the official recommendation to "treat" with midazolam and morphine):
This should rattle a few cages, Doctor. If only a major newspaper could break free of the shackles and demand in banner headlines, for the issue to be thoroughly investigated.
I have to admit that the details are too complicated to me as a layman. But nevertheless there is a significant takeaway of information for me: there is hardly ANY source at all about the amount of this stuff in the vials. Falko Steger only found ONE paper at all. And second: These LNPs are causing at lot of trouble, mess and destruction on membranes and cell-interior.
Question comes into my mind, if there is a reason why there is so little information available on LNPs in 'vaccines'? (You yourself mention having been censored heavily.)
Hope my writing may be of some use to you (or anybody else reading it)
I am endlessly proud, also the last draft we submitted as answer to the major revision on APSB and prepublished on Preprints is not the finalized draft: We made it! We're OFFICIAL peer reviewed in an impact factor 14.6 pharmacology journal published by Elsevier and had to go now to the hell of editorial revision. Which means: The scientific argumentation we presented has been accepted but formatting stuff needed to be fixed.
In 2019/2020, a toxin was released, maybe. People who got sick with the flu were not treated and/or given Morphine/Midazolam and/ or suffocated on a ventilator: = “pandemic corona virus.“ Vaccines” that ensured replication of the toxin within the body were pushed as the “solution” to the “ problem.” Inventors and investors were well aware of the mechanisms of action of the toxin. They designed them. There was no emergency-generated research. There was only a confected panic. The amazingly complex poison shots were ready to go, having been developed over decades.
We live ( and die) with the intended consequences. All that said, I’m grateful to doctors and researchers who are trying to assess and counter the devilish design of the poisons.
I am sure this is worth additional focus. Talking to colleagues from the pharmaceutical industry, they tell me that compound drugs were always a pain to get to market, as the regulators required safety testing of each component separately as well as of the final compound product. This was totally neglected for these products. Also LNPs were known for their toxicity and one reason why Moderna had failed to get to market any of the cancer vaccines they'd been working on, because the toxicity was culmulative so not good for a drug to be used in repeated doses over time. Trying to swap their technology into a prophylactic 'vaccine' failed dismally as the mRNA products had no lasting efficacy against any evolving viral strains and giving recurrent boosters puts it straight back into the problems of cumulative toxicity.
And that is without even addressing the other concerns about biodistribution and duration of action of the mRNA itself. The Pfizer pharmacokinetic rat studies, such as they were, used only the LNPs and did not consider the mRNA persisting at all.
Who is going to help us detect the white fibrous thrombi?! Cardiologists? Scientists? Right now, only the Undertakers are detecting them!
There was no medical emergency vis-à-vis COVID-19. This virus was treatable with cheap repurposed drugs (hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin). There was never any need for the mRNA inoculations.
The severity of the coronavirus was greatly exaggerated. There was never any need for the COVID-19 lockdowns and other restrictions.
Exactly.
There were no excess deaths in Ireland until a sudden 20% jump during January 2021:
https://ripcounties.ie/the-national-picture/
But there were some excess deaths in neighbouring UK around April 2020 while NG163 from NICE was in force (the official recommendation to "treat" with midazolam and morphine):
https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/the-death-penalty-drugs-used-by-care
This should rattle a few cages, Doctor. If only a major newspaper could break free of the shackles and demand in banner headlines, for the issue to be thoroughly investigated.
Suspect the liability risks are too high for anyone to touch this.
Dear Dr. McMillan,
thank you for this useful report on LNPs.
I would like to add two or three pieces of information you might be not aware of.
Source of these information is Falko Steger (aka Genervter Bürger).
In one of his newer pieces (January 2026) he provides very detailed information about the real life structure and behaviour of LNPs.
https://genervter.substack.com/p/why-lipid-nanoparticles-are-colloidal
What seems more important and concerning to me is an older post (that was in the good old times when he was still writing in German language..)
https://genervter.substack.com/p/die-mutter-aller-bomben?utm_source=publication-search
I have to admit that the details are too complicated to me as a layman. But nevertheless there is a significant takeaway of information for me: there is hardly ANY source at all about the amount of this stuff in the vials. Falko Steger only found ONE paper at all. And second: These LNPs are causing at lot of trouble, mess and destruction on membranes and cell-interior.
Question comes into my mind, if there is a reason why there is so little information available on LNPs in 'vaccines'? (You yourself mention having been censored heavily.)
Hope my writing may be of some use to you (or anybody else reading it)
best regards
Stefan
https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202511.0517#sec7-preprints-184611
Thank you so much for reading!
I am endlessly proud, also the last draft we submitted as answer to the major revision on APSB and prepublished on Preprints is not the finalized draft: We made it! We're OFFICIAL peer reviewed in an impact factor 14.6 pharmacology journal published by Elsevier and had to go now to the hell of editorial revision. Which means: The scientific argumentation we presented has been accepted but formatting stuff needed to be fixed.
Dr.McMillsn,
Could you, at some point, explain to the less medically qualified:
- The interaction and effects of the mRNA 'vaccine' on the patient's own DNA?
Although possible to influence the DNA, it requires to jump through a number of hoops to become integrated.
In my view the bigger risk is mRNA persistence and the LNP adduction risks.
Thank you, Dr. McMillan.
Relatedly:
Dr. Robert Malone Takes Dr. Richard Urso's Question About the Lipid Nanoparticles
"We have a clear trail of breadcrumbs about reproductive toxicity that's not being followed up."
Transcript: https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/216972.html
Source video:
"COVID-19: A Second Opinion"
Senator Ron Johnson, Streamed on January 24, 2022
"COVID-19: A Second Opinion" Roundtable
https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html
Time stamps: 5:14-15 - 5:23:52
Also relatedly:
Dr. Byram Bridle on the Japanese Biodistribution Study (excerpts)
"with it accumulating in the ovaries, one of my questions is, will we be rendering young people infertile?"
Transcript of excerpt: https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/12788.html
Source audio:
Alex Pierson interviews Dr. Byram Bridle, an Associate Professor of Viral Immunology at the University of Guelph
May 28, 2021
https://omny.fm/shows/on-point-with-alex-pierson/new-peer-reviewed-study-on-covid-19-vaccines-sugge
UPDATE: The above link has gone dark, but the same interview, with slightly differing time stamps, is available here:
https://podtail.com/podcast/on-point-with-alex-pierson/dr-byram-bridle-on-point-with-alex-pierson/
and:
"GenerationBigTime" posted a copy August 21, 2021 on rumble at: https://rumble.com/vkts8q-dr-byram-bridle-on-on-point-with-alex-pierson-the-spike-proteins-are-toxic.html
Elon Musk posted about the harms from the Covid shots. Note the number of views on his post and the one he reposted.
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2043276162487759115
Is the damn breaking on the harms?
"The approval of Onpattro in 2018 demonstrated that LNPs could safely and effectively deliver nucleic acids to specific tissues". https://www.nature.com/articles/s44222-025-00362-x
2026: "... but what happens to the lipid nanoparticle system after it has done its job[?]"
Humankind would be a lot better off if the question had been asked in 2018, and potential approval considered in 2026.
In 2019/2020, a toxin was released, maybe. People who got sick with the flu were not treated and/or given Morphine/Midazolam and/ or suffocated on a ventilator: = “pandemic corona virus.“ Vaccines” that ensured replication of the toxin within the body were pushed as the “solution” to the “ problem.” Inventors and investors were well aware of the mechanisms of action of the toxin. They designed them. There was no emergency-generated research. There was only a confected panic. The amazingly complex poison shots were ready to go, having been developed over decades.
We live ( and die) with the intended consequences. All that said, I’m grateful to doctors and researchers who are trying to assess and counter the devilish design of the poisons.
I am sure this is worth additional focus. Talking to colleagues from the pharmaceutical industry, they tell me that compound drugs were always a pain to get to market, as the regulators required safety testing of each component separately as well as of the final compound product. This was totally neglected for these products. Also LNPs were known for their toxicity and one reason why Moderna had failed to get to market any of the cancer vaccines they'd been working on, because the toxicity was culmulative so not good for a drug to be used in repeated doses over time. Trying to swap their technology into a prophylactic 'vaccine' failed dismally as the mRNA products had no lasting efficacy against any evolving viral strains and giving recurrent boosters puts it straight back into the problems of cumulative toxicity.
And that is without even addressing the other concerns about biodistribution and duration of action of the mRNA itself. The Pfizer pharmacokinetic rat studies, such as they were, used only the LNPs and did not consider the mRNA persisting at all.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. As for management of Covid see https://bamjiinrye.wordpress.com/2026/04/07/a-draft-of-not-the-hallett-inquiry/. Any suggestions before it goes out as a definitive document are welcome.
Very interesting. Thank you.