Please see https://x.com/hervk102/status/1945919956924678343 for discussion of the shedding deaths found in Japan. Perhaps 6% of the shedding deaths in England for the first 17 months of the Pfizer mRNA rollout, were due to sudden deaths caused by "bioweaponized SARS-CoV-2" . Bioweaponized SARS-CoV-2 means the variant is covered in spike IgG1/3 from the upper respiratory tract, and causes clotting when transmitted (here the large white rubbery clots).
The white rubbery clots (bioweaponized SARS-Cov-2= COVID-19 deaths ) and the coffee grounds clots (bioweaponized HERV-K102 or shedding= non-COVID-19 deaths ) have been reported by embalmers in 2022 to present day. At some point when there is so much IgG1/3 in the URT, it causes sudden death with the bioweaponized SC2 and so now the host tests negative for SC2, so these deaths are counted as non-COVID-19 deaths.
In other word the shedding deaths for England while mostly due to the Pfizer LNPs contaminating the HERV-K102 particles in the upper respiratory tract and these S2 coated CD9 positive exosomes covered in Spike antibodies are postulated to cause the microclotting deaths (the coffee grind clots) in this category of "non-COVID-19 deaths" perhaps 6% may have been due to sudden death with the bioweaponized SARS-CoV-2. This means death occurs before SARS-CoV-2 replicatei so the host tests negative for SARS-CoV-2 and so is captured as a non-COVID-19 death in the records.
Hi Dr Laderoute, your paper is highly immunologically technical, and above my paygrade, however you do not seem to incorporate the new findings about the amyloid nature of the clots. Samples of the white vascular clots have recently been analysed and have been found to contain high levels of misfolded fibrinogen which is amyloid in nature. This result coincides with the prionogenic epitopes of the spike protein itself, which were predicted to cause just such a reaction. It seems that an adequate hypothesis to account for the abnormal clots can be restricted to the protein misfolding alone. The immunological mechanisms may only be contributory.
Certainly the white rubbery "calamari" clots involve protein misfolding and the spike protein seems to drive this abnormal conformation of fibrinogen into the "helical strands" which is very interesting. But something has to initiate the clotting. We know both spike protein and endotoxin can drive microclotting which is said to generate the ground coffee clots (and result in petechiae behind the lower lip). So how is it that under some circumstances the larger more stringy white fibrous clots are instead created? I have proposed that the bioweaponized SARS-CoV-2 ( meaning SARS-CoV-2 in the URT of someone who has had at least 2 doses of the COVID-19 spike mRNA is covered in spike IG1/3) upon transmission deep in the lungs of the recipient to the microcirculation causes clotting, The higher the amount of antibody the worse the clotting is and the faster the death. Bowe B et al, [Nov 2022 Nat Med]
have shown the people who were infected before, and then get infected again (or if vaccinated, then the breakthrough infection) are at at much higher risk of injury and death. And this risk of death of about 1% occurs in the unvaccinated and vaccinated, meaning the risk is independent of vaccine status. I am thinking that these deaths (captured as COVID-19 deaths) represent for example the delta variant being transmitted from someone who received the second dose and thus the SARS-CoV-2 virions are coated in the spike IgG1/3 antibodies which surely initiate clotting. By the way we know in England in late June 2021 to early July 2021 that with the second dose compared to the first dose in the 50 + there was an excess of 1% delta variant deaths which almost disappeared by September 2021. We know this represented the peak of shedding deaths (bioweaponized HERV-K102) where the major peak disappeared by September 2021. So what I am saying it is not unexpected that both shedding and bioweaponized SARS-COV-2 could be derived from a single URT. I made an attempt to calculate the number of bioweaponized SARS-CoV-2 cases that were included in the shedding deaths in England and it was about 6 % (affecting the vaccinated and unvaccinated separately). The other mechanism involving shedding probably contributes to cardiac arrests (affecting the electrical impulses that control the rythym of the heart). So the dysrhythmias, the carditis, and ischemic heart blockages (myocardial infarction) may be largely due to this other mechanism "shedding" which is unique to the Pfizer mRNA made with dirty process 2. Shedding does not occur with the Moderna vaccine.
Thank you for this detailed response. I will pass this information on to better qualified researchers than myself, who are able to evaluate your hypothesis, in case it is helpful to them.
Certainly the large clots seem to form over varied timescales, some rapidly, usually after a further vaccination which might trigger immune inflammatory reactions and some seem to develop more gradually. This is according to the comments recorded by Vanhatupa, here.
In the absence of clinical research on this topic, the comments are the best record of patient histories that I can find.
Also I remember seeing Dr Fleming show how the mRNA injection bleached fresh blood when the two substances were brought together. The mRNA was definitely damaging the haem component of the RBC, and maybe this aspect of the spike protein (or maybe some other component in the "vaccine") is able to lyse RBC's directly and release the haemoglobin into the blood.
Perhaps this accounts for some of the free haemoglobin that is found in the abnormal clots.
I wonder if they considered enough of the confounding variables for the graph to be trusted? For example there were waves of vaccinations and waves of infections on different calendar dates. There were different mixes of vaccinees on different dates (varying ages, comorbidities, professions). The rates of unvaccinated deaths is probably irrelevant, because I bet they would be a drastically different cohort from the vaccinated in Japan. The only useful comparison is different days out from the vaccination, and probably it should be a three dimensional graph with date of vaccination on one axis and days until death on the other axis and rate on the third dimension. Just my opinion, but that's how I think it should have been done. (It is good that people in Japan are looking at these things of course. Maybe Japanese culture makes the authorities feel more duty to be honorable in their positions.)
Pre 2020 my small country had an all cause mortality rate of 20.000 per year.
It spiked then leveled out at 30.000 and seems to be holding steady. That's a 50% increase in mortality. It really isn't all that notable unless you live in a small right community like I do.
I in fact walked past the church and gave a nieghour a hug for the loss of his father as the funeral ended
His home in now the 7th household that has had a death on my rural road.
Please see https://x.com/hervk102/status/1945919956924678343 for discussion of the shedding deaths found in Japan. Perhaps 6% of the shedding deaths in England for the first 17 months of the Pfizer mRNA rollout, were due to sudden deaths caused by "bioweaponized SARS-CoV-2" . Bioweaponized SARS-CoV-2 means the variant is covered in spike IgG1/3 from the upper respiratory tract, and causes clotting when transmitted (here the large white rubbery clots).
The white rubbery clots (bioweaponized SARS-Cov-2= COVID-19 deaths ) and the coffee grounds clots (bioweaponized HERV-K102 or shedding= non-COVID-19 deaths ) have been reported by embalmers in 2022 to present day. At some point when there is so much IgG1/3 in the URT, it causes sudden death with the bioweaponized SC2 and so now the host tests negative for SC2, so these deaths are counted as non-COVID-19 deaths.
In other word the shedding deaths for England while mostly due to the Pfizer LNPs contaminating the HERV-K102 particles in the upper respiratory tract and these S2 coated CD9 positive exosomes covered in Spike antibodies are postulated to cause the microclotting deaths (the coffee grind clots) in this category of "non-COVID-19 deaths" perhaps 6% may have been due to sudden death with the bioweaponized SARS-CoV-2. This means death occurs before SARS-CoV-2 replicatei so the host tests negative for SARS-CoV-2 and so is captured as a non-COVID-19 death in the records.
Hi Dr Laderoute, your paper is highly immunologically technical, and above my paygrade, however you do not seem to incorporate the new findings about the amyloid nature of the clots. Samples of the white vascular clots have recently been analysed and have been found to contain high levels of misfolded fibrinogen which is amyloid in nature. This result coincides with the prionogenic epitopes of the spike protein itself, which were predicted to cause just such a reaction. It seems that an adequate hypothesis to account for the abnormal clots can be restricted to the protein misfolding alone. The immunological mechanisms may only be contributory.
https://kevinwmccairnphd282302.substack.com/p/cadaver-calamari-amyloidogenic-fibrin
https://kevinwmccairnphd282302.substack.com/p/amyloidogenic-fibrin-microclotting
However, you may be right about the shedding problem, because these amyloid fibrils have been found in both vaccinated and unvaccinated blood.
Certainly the white rubbery "calamari" clots involve protein misfolding and the spike protein seems to drive this abnormal conformation of fibrinogen into the "helical strands" which is very interesting. But something has to initiate the clotting. We know both spike protein and endotoxin can drive microclotting which is said to generate the ground coffee clots (and result in petechiae behind the lower lip). So how is it that under some circumstances the larger more stringy white fibrous clots are instead created? I have proposed that the bioweaponized SARS-CoV-2 ( meaning SARS-CoV-2 in the URT of someone who has had at least 2 doses of the COVID-19 spike mRNA is covered in spike IG1/3) upon transmission deep in the lungs of the recipient to the microcirculation causes clotting, The higher the amount of antibody the worse the clotting is and the faster the death. Bowe B et al, [Nov 2022 Nat Med]
have shown the people who were infected before, and then get infected again (or if vaccinated, then the breakthrough infection) are at at much higher risk of injury and death. And this risk of death of about 1% occurs in the unvaccinated and vaccinated, meaning the risk is independent of vaccine status. I am thinking that these deaths (captured as COVID-19 deaths) represent for example the delta variant being transmitted from someone who received the second dose and thus the SARS-CoV-2 virions are coated in the spike IgG1/3 antibodies which surely initiate clotting. By the way we know in England in late June 2021 to early July 2021 that with the second dose compared to the first dose in the 50 + there was an excess of 1% delta variant deaths which almost disappeared by September 2021. We know this represented the peak of shedding deaths (bioweaponized HERV-K102) where the major peak disappeared by September 2021. So what I am saying it is not unexpected that both shedding and bioweaponized SARS-COV-2 could be derived from a single URT. I made an attempt to calculate the number of bioweaponized SARS-CoV-2 cases that were included in the shedding deaths in England and it was about 6 % (affecting the vaccinated and unvaccinated separately). The other mechanism involving shedding probably contributes to cardiac arrests (affecting the electrical impulses that control the rythym of the heart). So the dysrhythmias, the carditis, and ischemic heart blockages (myocardial infarction) may be largely due to this other mechanism "shedding" which is unique to the Pfizer mRNA made with dirty process 2. Shedding does not occur with the Moderna vaccine.
Thank you for this detailed response. I will pass this information on to better qualified researchers than myself, who are able to evaluate your hypothesis, in case it is helpful to them.
Certainly the large clots seem to form over varied timescales, some rapidly, usually after a further vaccination which might trigger immune inflammatory reactions and some seem to develop more gradually. This is according to the comments recorded by Vanhatupa, here.
https://vesavanhatupa.substack.com/p/youtube-comments-confirm-the-clots
In the absence of clinical research on this topic, the comments are the best record of patient histories that I can find.
Also I remember seeing Dr Fleming show how the mRNA injection bleached fresh blood when the two substances were brought together. The mRNA was definitely damaging the haem component of the RBC, and maybe this aspect of the spike protein (or maybe some other component in the "vaccine") is able to lyse RBC's directly and release the haemoglobin into the blood.
Perhaps this accounts for some of the free haemoglobin that is found in the abnormal clots.
I wonder if they considered enough of the confounding variables for the graph to be trusted? For example there were waves of vaccinations and waves of infections on different calendar dates. There were different mixes of vaccinees on different dates (varying ages, comorbidities, professions). The rates of unvaccinated deaths is probably irrelevant, because I bet they would be a drastically different cohort from the vaccinated in Japan. The only useful comparison is different days out from the vaccination, and probably it should be a three dimensional graph with date of vaccination on one axis and days until death on the other axis and rate on the third dimension. Just my opinion, but that's how I think it should have been done. (It is good that people in Japan are looking at these things of course. Maybe Japanese culture makes the authorities feel more duty to be honorable in their positions.)
The Peak in Japanese Jab Deaths after the first Jab was 24 Days.
The data also destroys the "Yellow Dot Lot" theory.
Example Lot FM3289 where we see 死亡数 = number of deaths is 3,066 from 216,505 Jabs.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/japanese-data-on-covid19-jab-deaths
Pre 2020 my small country had an all cause mortality rate of 20.000 per year.
It spiked then leveled out at 30.000 and seems to be holding steady. That's a 50% increase in mortality. It really isn't all that notable unless you live in a small right community like I do.
I in fact walked past the church and gave a nieghour a hug for the loss of his father as the funeral ended
His home in now the 7th household that has had a death on my rural road.
Thank you, Dr. McMillan for taking the time and reposting this valuable information.
I think it’s being censored the sound went off in the midst of presentation
This topic is still taboo amongst my Boomer age group.