The comments beneath my YouTube discussion reveal something larger than one celebrity death: a public trying to understand illness after the pandemic while science still lacks the honest evidence.
No meaningful research can be expected from the purveyors of the 'wonder drug,' and so the argument regarding the extent of the catastrophe won't stack up until the bodies do. Sad, but true.
I noticed the anger about the jabs first. My answer was that Dolly likely had no clue whatsoever about the dangers. One of the things on the list of coercions that the CDC contracted advertising agencies for was to use celebrities. Public Service Announcement - celebrities are very good at reading stuff written by other people, in a believable manner. For money. Duh. Also on that list were guilting, ridicule, protecting granny, etc. That was freely available on the CDC website, and I think it was the first thing that made me start thinking no, this seems skeevy. There is, in my mind, a vast and clear difference between those who truly believed the jab would protect, and those who knew damn right well it was injurious.
What really surprised me was the swift descent from "she pushed the jab" down to "she makes the devil sign, she was really a man, she was part of the Hollywood cabal" accusations. Not saying I know one way or the other. All I know for sure is that she never descended into hate and ridicule for those of us who just said no. No politicization. And to those who just wholesale hate on anybody who sort of witlessly and well-meaningfully pushed the jab - no need to spend what is remaining of your life carrying hatred in your heart - those who did get jabbed will have retribution enough. I feel sad for most of them. Not the rancid authoritarians, but the folks who believe anything a doctor or a journalist or a talking head (covers journalists, IMO) and our government tells them. I do hate the folks who created the jab, the reason for the jab, and who derided, hated on, deprived naysayers of their jobs and reputations. I know someone who still calls ivermectin horse paste. It is funny, that person thinks I must not be very intelligent after all, and i feel right back at ya, except I believe that person truly believes in the jab, against horrific evidence.
And I wish the fix was as easy as randomly slapping nicotine patches on people, like salespeople with their ninja perfume spray attacks at malls.
Dolly was a great singer if you liked her style of music. To say you loved her when you never met or solidly engaged with her is over the top. Unfortunately there is a group in the community who are influenced by people because of their fame who have no scientific knowledge on the subject they promote. The result is likely many others suffered badly or died due to taking unqualified advice from an entertainer they enjoyed their work. Its very sad. I agree with Dr McMillan but Denis Raincourt's work on access deaths would put Dolly in the numbers.
The same could be said for the previous UK Queen who was used to push the jab
Gyles Brandreth MP who was well connected to the Royal family has flagged this a number of times.
Clearly we don't know but my take is celebrities should not be permitted to push drugs in the same way Pharma is not allowed to say "Safe and Effective"
Using celebrities to push the jab was on the list of coercions that the CDC used. I was a bit taken aback by some of the hatred from celebrities. My favorite stupid one was being told Jennifer Aniston dropped any friends who did not get jabbed. And the most puzzling was being called a Trumper for not getting jabbed, when Trump is inordinately proud of that jab. I honestly thought, and still think, are they that stupid, or do they honestly think i am that stupid. The calls for death and punishment of the un-jabbed were a lit shocking. It was kind of interesting to see just who was a raving authoritarian under a very thin veneer of civilization.
I understand that. The CDC did have a list on their website. I rolled my eyes at it, because not one of the ways to coerce/convince on it would have induced me to get the jab. That the WHO had a list just means that the effort was worldwide, as we already know.
What I had found was a simple list. I just looked at the CDC website and found this greatly expanded, and, IMO, evil list of ways to coerce. Like pretending the jab was in short supply.
They are that stupid. I have been saying it for some time, but the whole thing was a test of resolve, will we stand up to severe pressure or not and who/what do we really worship, our idols.
What I found bizarre is the fanatic Democrats who took the jab despite Trump's promotion and them hating his guts. Makes no sense and truly insane.
I agree with you, but social influencers, be they Dolly Parton or the Queen of England, or the latest green-haired kid on TikTok, are always going to offer some value for someone who is willing to pay and/or finagle to exploit. I mean, social influencers (under various terms) have always been with us, and always will be, for as long as there are human beings apt to fall under their spell.
I might suggest that for anyone who is a social influencer, think thrice before taking the money and/or falling for the flattery because maybe soon, maybe after you're dead, there can be some very ugly consequences.
Once again, Dr McMillan- you have the courage to confront, head on, a subject many will find sensitive. Your coverage and the commentaries are valid. As the truth has a *funny* way of leaking out, often on its own, we know there were/are concerns regarding the so-called *efficacy* of the Covid 19 injections. Anyone who has taken the time to read, really read the percentages of cancers and other deadly diseases following on the heels of these injections knows that Dolly Parton's luck ran out. A very, very sad story given her strong *belief* in the product and her giving heart. Tragic, really. May she and all those who preceded and will follow her- rest in peace.
By the way, how many times pre-Covid did we hear of people turning up with Stage 3, 4 End-stage cancers once discovered? Never in my experience.
Until histological evaluation of tumors with spike specific stains and other advanced techniques are employed routinely in patients who have developed a cancer seemingly overnight and have declined rapidly, we will never know the answer. Sadly, I do not expect that to happen. The vaccine industry is really a cartel in my mind. They operate for profit. They will not pursue any method of investigation that will nullify the safe and effective narrative. Not now, perhaps never. They use the term vaccine because it conveys a sense of safety and effectiveness. It conveys the idea that if not for vaccines the dreaded diseases of the late 19th century and early 20th century would have claimed many more lives. Hearing the word vaccine subliminally invokes the notion of protection in most people who have been primed to believe that vaccines are all really well studied and safe. Yes, people are very apprehensive since so many stories are appearing of injuries and deaths post vaccine that remain uninvestigated. While we cannot unequivocally say that the vaccine induced immune dysregulation in Dolly and thus, she developed a cancer, what we can say it that there is a clear pattern emerging of people becoming significantly ill post vaccine and there is a definite uptick in cancers that really skyrocketed in 2021 after the roll out. While correlation is not evidence of causation it points us in a direction that needs validation. If science were honest and unbiased as it should be then these correlations would be properly studied but, again the but, the powers to be will not allow it. I have compared these injuries and cancers to a series of crime scenes being investigated and the common thread to each scene is the vaccine. It is the common denominator in all of the crimes, so it becomes your primary suspect. But, you still need more evidence (the studies) to obtain a conviction. This is where we find ourselves. Your stink meter is pinning in the red and all of your instincts point you to the vaccines and you just need that last piece of the puzzle, but your hands are tied and the perp walks again. Maddening isn't it. For those of us who believe whole heartedly that the vaccines are the culprit it is stupefying and infuriating because every nerve in our bodies cries out for justice for all of the souls damaged, impaired, disabled, and deceased. Maybe one day real science and real integrity will return to medicine, and trust will be regained because it is surely lacking at this point and we can put this atrocious era of Covid behind us. I can only pray that God will answer that prayer.
Dr McMillan, thank you for posting on this and in your usual carefully considered way. (I have yet to watch the video, just read this post.)
May Dolly Parton find peace and healing in her new life beyond this realm.
Her last years remind me something one of my relatives often said: Learn from the mistakes of others.
We've all made mistakes, so we can all learn from each other, but it sure is a doozy when the mistakes result in the deaths and injuries of so many other people.
Celebrities were heavily targeted to serve the psy op of "'vaccine' compliance," and it seems they played Dolly Parton like a dulcimer.
And how - well said, TB. They duped Dolly and could never countenance that she died from the shot she believed was a great life-saver. The shot was and is a great life-taker. Dolly should have earmarked $1 million to Vanderbilt to study the embalmers’ clots … but she would never do that.
I can also concluded that Vanderbilt gaslighted her. Patents exist far ahead of 2019. Moderna was given the thing that produced and called a vaccine... from the US Dept of Defense.
Of course we won't know if the elderly Dolly Parton's final illness was a result of her covid jabs, and we'll probably never know, but I'd consider it a fair assumption that the "vaccines" messed up her immune system such that she died a few years sooner than she otherwise would have. This is unfortunately the case for almost everyone who took the shots and then succumbed to a stroke, heart attack, turbo cancer, and/or infection & etc & etc. — we don't know and we will probably never know if in fact their jabs hastened their deaths.
However, what adds up to a big fat elephant-sized problem following the jabs roll out and booster roll outs of 2021-2023 is the excess deaths data.
As for "correlation is not causation" — unfortunately few people have a basic education in statistics, and fewer still know anything about the Bradford Hill criteria.
"[F]irst proposed in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill, ["The Bradford Hill" criteria] provide a framework to determine if one can justifiably move from an observed association to a verdict of causation. The Bradford Hill criteria include nine viewpoints by which to evaluate human epidemiologic evidence to determine if causation can be deduced: strength, consistency, specificity, temporality, biological gradient, plausibility, coherence, experiment, and analogy."
The Covid problem and the cure for it both came from man. It took years just to get to the acceptance (by the majority not everyone) that it was in fact a man made problem. That alone is a major red flag.
The fact that there is zero interest to capture vital statistics by mRNA status when so many participated in the experiment and when so many are observing growing health problems within the population. It should be easy to do, health authorities around the world already demonstrated they could update cases, hospitalizations, and deaths daily by vaxx status and then broadcast it non stop. Obvious red flag. The lack of interest or even pushback to conduct autopsies, and the attacks for suggesting we should be making it a priority to study these cases is another major red flag that there are real problems.
Thank you for the work you continue to do on this matter.
I am glad you have pointed this out. I am amazed and dismayed by the readiness of the vast majority to accept the 'we don't know, know but we know' as peddled by Candace Owens and many others.
True, but some of the deaths (not Dolly’s) are so stereotypical and the media response so immediately dismissive, that we know that we’re over the target.
I mainly agree. Turbo cancer has been well documented by Angus Dalgleish, Dr William Makis et al and the potentially causative agents including SV40 and residual DNA fragments equally so as have the potential mechanisms including p53 changes etc so when someone is vaccinated and they develop turbo cancer it is a big red flag and you could say the vaccine is a prime suspect BUT people invariably jump to conclusion and believe they know when they don't know, they just suspect. That is what irks me.
from listening to the news reports, news seems to be framed in a way to lay some of the blame on the extreme effort she made to care for her dying husband not long ago, since she lived beyond the average age if the vaxx did shorten her life its hidden by her age and perhaps the extreme stress she experieicned by taking personal effort to care for her dying husband
Vincent Munster is in jail for smuggling pathogens.
Eric Rubin of NEJM was told by Fauci what to do.
Dr. David Morens is expected to plead guilty.
Mori et al, Marks et al and thousands of more scientific papers prove the evidence of iatrogenic harm by vaccines - let alone the CDC admitting there is no placebo-controlled double-blinded safety study of any vaccine.
I think we have always expected that the studies you mention are of course being done or HAVE BEEN done on all vaccines and medicines. But we learned they haven’t been done and I guess never were. Not only missing here because of warp speed.
And we have RFK Jr. TRYING TO GET THIS CHANGED!!! He simply wants vaccines to be TESTED, JUST LIKE ANT OTHER MEDICATION, and all he's getting from the Damno-Kraatz are bullsh!T accusations that he wants to rake everyone's "Soma" away, WHAAAAAAHHHH!!!!! 😳🥺🥹😱😭😭😭
My question is "why did she not declare to the public she had cancer'? Age is not the issue, unless you have previously had health issues. My mum is 89 and and is healthy, she refuses all vaccines.
The whole thing is far darker than people have acknowledged. Research and patents on SARS-COV-2 and the mRNA "vaccine" have existed for more than a decade. Moderna was GIVEN what they released as a vaccine by US Dept of Defense, who paid for everything.
The fact that Vanderbilt pretended to research the vaccine is a limited hang out at best, and more likely gaslighting.
The reason no science is being done is because it was a democidal attack.
No meaningful research can be expected from the purveyors of the 'wonder drug,' and so the argument regarding the extent of the catastrophe won't stack up until the bodies do. Sad, but true.
Thank you, Doctor McMillan.
I noticed the anger about the jabs first. My answer was that Dolly likely had no clue whatsoever about the dangers. One of the things on the list of coercions that the CDC contracted advertising agencies for was to use celebrities. Public Service Announcement - celebrities are very good at reading stuff written by other people, in a believable manner. For money. Duh. Also on that list were guilting, ridicule, protecting granny, etc. That was freely available on the CDC website, and I think it was the first thing that made me start thinking no, this seems skeevy. There is, in my mind, a vast and clear difference between those who truly believed the jab would protect, and those who knew damn right well it was injurious.
What really surprised me was the swift descent from "she pushed the jab" down to "she makes the devil sign, she was really a man, she was part of the Hollywood cabal" accusations. Not saying I know one way or the other. All I know for sure is that she never descended into hate and ridicule for those of us who just said no. No politicization. And to those who just wholesale hate on anybody who sort of witlessly and well-meaningfully pushed the jab - no need to spend what is remaining of your life carrying hatred in your heart - those who did get jabbed will have retribution enough. I feel sad for most of them. Not the rancid authoritarians, but the folks who believe anything a doctor or a journalist or a talking head (covers journalists, IMO) and our government tells them. I do hate the folks who created the jab, the reason for the jab, and who derided, hated on, deprived naysayers of their jobs and reputations. I know someone who still calls ivermectin horse paste. It is funny, that person thinks I must not be very intelligent after all, and i feel right back at ya, except I believe that person truly believes in the jab, against horrific evidence.
And I wish the fix was as easy as randomly slapping nicotine patches on people, like salespeople with their ninja perfume spray attacks at malls.
Dolly was a great singer if you liked her style of music. To say you loved her when you never met or solidly engaged with her is over the top. Unfortunately there is a group in the community who are influenced by people because of their fame who have no scientific knowledge on the subject they promote. The result is likely many others suffered badly or died due to taking unqualified advice from an entertainer they enjoyed their work. Its very sad. I agree with Dr McMillan but Denis Raincourt's work on access deaths would put Dolly in the numbers.
celebrities have a strong power of influence
And thus carry responsibility for what they advise people to do.
How many lives were lost as a result of Dolly Parton's singing and dancing for the gene-jabs?
Well said.
spirit of the age is seeking profit and not acting with integrity.... they despise the GOLDEN RULE
The same could be said for the previous UK Queen who was used to push the jab
Gyles Brandreth MP who was well connected to the Royal family has flagged this a number of times.
Clearly we don't know but my take is celebrities should not be permitted to push drugs in the same way Pharma is not allowed to say "Safe and Effective"
Using celebrities to push the jab was on the list of coercions that the CDC used. I was a bit taken aback by some of the hatred from celebrities. My favorite stupid one was being told Jennifer Aniston dropped any friends who did not get jabbed. And the most puzzling was being called a Trumper for not getting jabbed, when Trump is inordinately proud of that jab. I honestly thought, and still think, are they that stupid, or do they honestly think i am that stupid. The calls for death and punishment of the un-jabbed were a lit shocking. It was kind of interesting to see just who was a raving authoritarian under a very thin veneer of civilization.
The WHO written guidelines specifically instructed to focus on “persons of influence,” like clergy.
I understand that. The CDC did have a list on their website. I rolled my eyes at it, because not one of the ways to coerce/convince on it would have induced me to get the jab. That the WHO had a list just means that the effort was worldwide, as we already know.
What I had found was a simple list. I just looked at the CDC website and found this greatly expanded, and, IMO, evil list of ways to coerce. Like pretending the jab was in short supply.
https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/vaccines/covid-19/vaccinate-with-confidence/community.html
Push the clergy to promoted the lurgy!
They are that stupid. I have been saying it for some time, but the whole thing was a test of resolve, will we stand up to severe pressure or not and who/what do we really worship, our idols.
What I found bizarre is the fanatic Democrats who took the jab despite Trump's promotion and them hating his guts. Makes no sense and truly insane.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/the-great-covid-retest?utm_source=publication-search
Well said.
I agree with you, but social influencers, be they Dolly Parton or the Queen of England, or the latest green-haired kid on TikTok, are always going to offer some value for someone who is willing to pay and/or finagle to exploit. I mean, social influencers (under various terms) have always been with us, and always will be, for as long as there are human beings apt to fall under their spell.
I might suggest that for anyone who is a social influencer, think thrice before taking the money and/or falling for the flattery because maybe soon, maybe after you're dead, there can be some very ugly consequences.
Well said.
She was a philanthropath.
Nice one!
Once again, Dr McMillan- you have the courage to confront, head on, a subject many will find sensitive. Your coverage and the commentaries are valid. As the truth has a *funny* way of leaking out, often on its own, we know there were/are concerns regarding the so-called *efficacy* of the Covid 19 injections. Anyone who has taken the time to read, really read the percentages of cancers and other deadly diseases following on the heels of these injections knows that Dolly Parton's luck ran out. A very, very sad story given her strong *belief* in the product and her giving heart. Tragic, really. May she and all those who preceded and will follow her- rest in peace.
By the way, how many times pre-Covid did we hear of people turning up with Stage 3, 4 End-stage cancers once discovered? Never in my experience.
Until histological evaluation of tumors with spike specific stains and other advanced techniques are employed routinely in patients who have developed a cancer seemingly overnight and have declined rapidly, we will never know the answer. Sadly, I do not expect that to happen. The vaccine industry is really a cartel in my mind. They operate for profit. They will not pursue any method of investigation that will nullify the safe and effective narrative. Not now, perhaps never. They use the term vaccine because it conveys a sense of safety and effectiveness. It conveys the idea that if not for vaccines the dreaded diseases of the late 19th century and early 20th century would have claimed many more lives. Hearing the word vaccine subliminally invokes the notion of protection in most people who have been primed to believe that vaccines are all really well studied and safe. Yes, people are very apprehensive since so many stories are appearing of injuries and deaths post vaccine that remain uninvestigated. While we cannot unequivocally say that the vaccine induced immune dysregulation in Dolly and thus, she developed a cancer, what we can say it that there is a clear pattern emerging of people becoming significantly ill post vaccine and there is a definite uptick in cancers that really skyrocketed in 2021 after the roll out. While correlation is not evidence of causation it points us in a direction that needs validation. If science were honest and unbiased as it should be then these correlations would be properly studied but, again the but, the powers to be will not allow it. I have compared these injuries and cancers to a series of crime scenes being investigated and the common thread to each scene is the vaccine. It is the common denominator in all of the crimes, so it becomes your primary suspect. But, you still need more evidence (the studies) to obtain a conviction. This is where we find ourselves. Your stink meter is pinning in the red and all of your instincts point you to the vaccines and you just need that last piece of the puzzle, but your hands are tied and the perp walks again. Maddening isn't it. For those of us who believe whole heartedly that the vaccines are the culprit it is stupefying and infuriating because every nerve in our bodies cries out for justice for all of the souls damaged, impaired, disabled, and deceased. Maybe one day real science and real integrity will return to medicine, and trust will be regained because it is surely lacking at this point and we can put this atrocious era of Covid behind us. I can only pray that God will answer that prayer.
Dr McMillan, thank you for posting on this and in your usual carefully considered way. (I have yet to watch the video, just read this post.)
May Dolly Parton find peace and healing in her new life beyond this realm.
Her last years remind me something one of my relatives often said: Learn from the mistakes of others.
We've all made mistakes, so we can all learn from each other, but it sure is a doozy when the mistakes result in the deaths and injuries of so many other people.
Celebrities were heavily targeted to serve the psy op of "'vaccine' compliance," and it seems they played Dolly Parton like a dulcimer.
And how - well said, TB. They duped Dolly and could never countenance that she died from the shot she believed was a great life-saver. The shot was and is a great life-taker. Dolly should have earmarked $1 million to Vanderbilt to study the embalmers’ clots … but she would never do that.
You can't conclude that the shots took Dolly Parton's life.
You can conclude that Dolly Parton's gene-jab advocacy likely killed many people.
I can also concluded that Vanderbilt gaslighted her. Patents exist far ahead of 2019. Moderna was given the thing that produced and called a vaccine... from the US Dept of Defense.
It was a global democide lead by the US military.
Good logical point, although I think someone could plausibly reach the conclusion that Dolly died prematurely because she got the shots.
Of course we won't know if the elderly Dolly Parton's final illness was a result of her covid jabs, and we'll probably never know, but I'd consider it a fair assumption that the "vaccines" messed up her immune system such that she died a few years sooner than she otherwise would have. This is unfortunately the case for almost everyone who took the shots and then succumbed to a stroke, heart attack, turbo cancer, and/or infection & etc & etc. — we don't know and we will probably never know if in fact their jabs hastened their deaths.
However, what adds up to a big fat elephant-sized problem following the jabs roll out and booster roll outs of 2021-2023 is the excess deaths data.
As for "correlation is not causation" — unfortunately few people have a basic education in statistics, and fewer still know anything about the Bradford Hill criteria.
"[F]irst proposed in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill, ["The Bradford Hill" criteria] provide a framework to determine if one can justifiably move from an observed association to a verdict of causation. The Bradford Hill criteria include nine viewpoints by which to evaluate human epidemiologic evidence to determine if causation can be deduced: strength, consistency, specificity, temporality, biological gradient, plausibility, coherence, experiment, and analogy."
— Source: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2022.938163/full
See also
Using the Bradford-Hill criteria to assess causality in the association between CHADOX1 NCOV-19 vaccine and thrombotic immune thrombocytopenia
https://jglobalbiosecurity.com/articles/10.31646/gbio.109
The evidence is there, much as our legacy media attempts to yammer on as if it isn't.
Hrm! Don't remember this from my Statistics 101 but looks legit to me. Thank you kindly.
The Covid problem and the cure for it both came from man. It took years just to get to the acceptance (by the majority not everyone) that it was in fact a man made problem. That alone is a major red flag.
The fact that there is zero interest to capture vital statistics by mRNA status when so many participated in the experiment and when so many are observing growing health problems within the population. It should be easy to do, health authorities around the world already demonstrated they could update cases, hospitalizations, and deaths daily by vaxx status and then broadcast it non stop. Obvious red flag. The lack of interest or even pushback to conduct autopsies, and the attacks for suggesting we should be making it a priority to study these cases is another major red flag that there are real problems.
Thank you for the work you continue to do on this matter.
I am glad you have pointed this out. I am amazed and dismayed by the readiness of the vast majority to accept the 'we don't know, know but we know' as peddled by Candace Owens and many others.
True, but some of the deaths (not Dolly’s) are so stereotypical and the media response so immediately dismissive, that we know that we’re over the target.
I mainly agree. Turbo cancer has been well documented by Angus Dalgleish, Dr William Makis et al and the potentially causative agents including SV40 and residual DNA fragments equally so as have the potential mechanisms including p53 changes etc so when someone is vaccinated and they develop turbo cancer it is a big red flag and you could say the vaccine is a prime suspect BUT people invariably jump to conclusion and believe they know when they don't know, they just suspect. That is what irks me.
Murderna she wrote
Clever!
from listening to the news reports, news seems to be framed in a way to lay some of the blame on the extreme effort she made to care for her dying husband not long ago, since she lived beyond the average age if the vaxx did shorten her life its hidden by her age and perhaps the extreme stress she experieicned by taking personal effort to care for her dying husband
Interesting and ironic that Dr McMillan's Youtube video is so (deservingly) popular.
Ms Parton part-sponsored and encouraged toxxination. Ms Wojkicki proudly boasted how she silenced millions of toxxine misinformationists.
Mother nature afforded each of them several years to recant their sins, but neither did.
Defying nature is asking for trouble.
"Some viewers immediately concluded that vaccination caused Dolly Parton’s cancer. That conclusion goes beyond the available evidence."
That's wrong. Poul Thorsen is expected to plead guilty: https://imahealth.substack.com/p/vaccine-researcher-expected-to-plead?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=31oy60
Vincent Munster is in jail for smuggling pathogens.
Eric Rubin of NEJM was told by Fauci what to do.
Dr. David Morens is expected to plead guilty.
Mori et al, Marks et al and thousands of more scientific papers prove the evidence of iatrogenic harm by vaccines - let alone the CDC admitting there is no placebo-controlled double-blinded safety study of any vaccine.
I think we have always expected that the studies you mention are of course being done or HAVE BEEN done on all vaccines and medicines. But we learned they haven’t been done and I guess never were. Not only missing here because of warp speed.
And we have RFK Jr. TRYING TO GET THIS CHANGED!!! He simply wants vaccines to be TESTED, JUST LIKE ANT OTHER MEDICATION, and all he's getting from the Damno-Kraatz are bullsh!T accusations that he wants to rake everyone's "Soma" away, WHAAAAAAHHHH!!!!! 😳🥺🥹😱😭😭😭
My question is "why did she not declare to the public she had cancer'? Age is not the issue, unless you have previously had health issues. My mum is 89 and and is healthy, she refuses all vaccines.
The whole thing is far darker than people have acknowledged. Research and patents on SARS-COV-2 and the mRNA "vaccine" have existed for more than a decade. Moderna was GIVEN what they released as a vaccine by US Dept of Defense, who paid for everything.
The fact that Vanderbilt pretended to research the vaccine is a limited hang out at best, and more likely gaslighting.
The reason no science is being done is because it was a democidal attack.